Right To Information - Judgment Search Results

Informant Vs. State Of Karnataka By

Court: Karnataka

“victim” within the meaning of CrPC cannot be asked to await the commencement of trial for asserting his/her right to participate in the proceedings. He/She has a legally vested right to be heard at every step post the … learned Counsel for the parties.3. On 18.05.2022, the victim girl aged about 21 years had submitted a written information, based on which FIR in Crime No.120/2022 was registered by Maddur Police Station, Mandya District, against respondent no.2

Public Information Officer vs the State Information Commission

Court: Kerala

THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.8.2023 IN WP(C) NO.15163 OF 2013 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER: PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, OFFICE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680001. BY ADV. SRI. P.C.SASIDHARAN KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN -

Public Information Officer vs the State Information Commission

Court: Kerala

THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.8.2023 IN WP(C) NO.15163 OF 2013 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER: PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, OFFICE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680001. BY ADV. SRI. P.C.SASIDHARAN KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN -

The Public Information Officer and Secretary, Shrimad Raghavendra Co-o ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2009(6)KarLJ299

Karnataka State Chief Information Commissioner, Bangalore and Anr. : 2009(1) Kar. L.J. 641 : 2008(4) KCCR 2357, the Right to Information Act, 2005 is not applicable to Co-operative Societies, inasmuch as, Co-operative Societies cannot be treated as a public … quashed. Writ petition is allowed accordingly. - Section 2(h): [Mohan Shantanagoudar, J] Applicability to Co-operative Societies Held, The Right to Information Act, 2005 is not applicable to Co-operative Societies, in as much as, Co-operative Societies cannot be treated as

The Public Information Officer/Joint Secretary to Chief Commissioner o ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2009AP73; 2009(1)ALT700

the ground that he/she is not a legal heir of Muntakhab holder is justified under the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act, for short)? This interesting question of considerable significance falls for consideration in this writ … genus of the article through the process of interpretation by this Apex Court. One such right is the 'right to information'. The right of the citizens to obtain information on matters relating to public acts flows from the fundamental

Public Information Officer, Chief Minister's Office, Civil Secretariat ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2008(4)AWC3574

given to the information seeker or it is an information, which stands exempted under Section 8(j) of the Right to Information Act.(2) Whether the Chief Information Commissioner while considering the complaints under Section 18 of the Right to Information … Right to Information Act.(2) Whether the Chief Information Commissioner while considering the complaints under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 Is competent only to award the prescribed punishment, in case of failure of information being given

Public Information Officer and anr. Vs. Orissa Information Commission ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 109(2010)CLT105

on the same day to the office of the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Cuttack. Section 7(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 provides that subject to the proviso to Sub-section (2) of Section 5 or the proviso to … Petitioner No. 2 to show cause as to why penalty as per provision of Section 29(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 should not be attracted. Pursuant to the notice dated 12.3.2007 issued to Petitioner No. 2, she

Public Information Officer,uty.of Calicu Vs. Sate Information Commissi ...

Court: Kerala

gone through the materials available on record.3. There is no dispute that the University is amenable with the Right to Information Act. Due to the efflux of time, no effective order can be passed in this writ petition directing

The Central Public Information Officer, Central Bureau of Investigatio ...

Court: Delhi

(hereafter „the CIC‟) allowing the second appeal (Appeal No.CIC/SB/A/2016/001171/MP) preferred by respondent no.2 under Section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter „the Act‟).2. By the impugned order, the CIC rejected the petitioner‟s contention that the Central

The Bidar District Central Co-op Bank Limited Represented by Its Manag ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2008KAR3830; 2009(1)KarLJ231:2009(1)AIRKarR481

be stated as under:The respondent No. 2 filed a complaint dated 26.4.2006 (Annexure-A) under Section 18(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (in short, 'the Act') before the Karnataka Information Commission/respondent No. 1 seeking information regarding:(a) the names … dated 18.7.2006 on the file of respondent No. 1 at Annexure-D is quashed no order as to costs. Right to information Act, 2005 - Sections 2(h), 2(h)(d), 2(h)(d)(1), 18(1) and 19(1)--Information sought by the second respondent--Direction of the first