Anar Devi Vs. Chandra Devi

- section 2(k), 2(1), 7 & 40 & juvenile justice (care and protection of children) rules, 2007, rule 12 & 98 & juvenile justice act, 1986, section 2(h): [altamas kabir & cyriac joseph, jj] determination as to juvenile - appellant was found to have completed the age of 16 years and 13 days on the date of alleged occurrence - appellant was arrested on 30.11.1998 when the 1986 act was in force and under clause (h) of section 2 a juvenile was described to mean a child who had not attained the age of sixteen years or a girl who had not attained the age of eighteen years - it is with the enactment of the juvenile justice act, 2000, that in section 2(k) a juvenile or child was defined to mean a child who had not completed eighteen years of a ge which was given prospective prospect - appellant was about sixteen years of age on the date of commission of the alleged offence and had not completed eighteen years of age when the juvenile justice act, 2000, came into force - juvenile act, of 2000 has been given retrospective effect by rule 12 of juvenile justice rule, 2007 - as such, accused has to be treated as juvenile under the said act. - even they may not require to pay any money in respect of payment of advocate's fee as well as typing charges etc. 6. in view of the provision of section 12 of the act, 1987 i am satisfied that the appellants are entitled for free and competent legal services and thus they are exempted from payment of the court fees......1987') lays down a criteria of giving free and competent legal services and provides that every person, who has to file a defend a case, shall be entitled to legal services under his act if that person is, inter alia, a woman or a child.3. the word 'legal service' is defined in section 2(c) of the act, 1987, which means-it includes the rendering of any service in the conduct of any case or other legal proceedings before any court or other authority or tribunal and the giving of advice on any legal matter.4. the act, 1987 is enacted to constitute the legal services authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities, and to organize lok adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on a basis of equal opportunity.5. it is unfortunate that though the appellants are entitled for free and competent legal services but instead of approaching to the rajasthan high court legal services authority, this appeal has been filed though advocate. in case they would have approached to the rajasthan high court legal service authority, there would not have been any difficulty for them to get free and competent legal services; even they may not require to pay any money in respect of payment of advocate's fee as well as typing charges etc.6. in view of the provision of section 12 of the act, 1987 i am satisfied that the appellants are entitled for free and competent legal services and thus they are exempted from payment of the court fees.7. the objection raised by the registry is waived.8. put up for admission of 15.4.2005.