By Reason Of - Judgment Search Results
for the Reasons Aforesaid I Find No Merit in This Second Appeal. Vs. B ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-05-2012
that the suit land was reported to be inside Abadi Deh and far away from khaSr.No.1182. For the reasons aforesaid, I find no merit in this second appeal. Concurrent finding recorded by both the courts below to
Case the Reasoning Given by the Trial Court Is Perverse and therefore, ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
dated 25.9.2013. In the second round, the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division).Chandigarh has rejected the application by giving reasoning in paragraph 5 of the order which reads as follows:- “5. I have heard both sides and gone
is No Reason for This Court to Issue Any Such Direction as Vs. State o ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
12:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM No.M-6543 of 2014 -2- is no reason for this Court to issue any such direction as prayed for, in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Section
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“for the Reasons Aforestated the Writ Petition Is Allowed to Vs. Bab ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
initially be valid for a period of 5 yeaRs.Relevant portion of the order read as under: “For the reasons aforestated, the writ petition is allowed to the extent that the communication dated 25.11.2003 (Annexure P- 2) demanding
M/S. Media Masters and Another Vs. M/S. Reasonable Advertising Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-10-2012
Time (“FCT”)per episode. 11. To market the serial and utilize the FTC given to them, the Petitioners approached Reasonable Advertising Private Limited (“the Respondents”). Negotiations ensued between the parties. Initially, a Memorandum of Understanding was entered into
M/S. Media Masters and Another Vs. M/S. Reasonable Advertising Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-10-2012
Time (“FCT”)per episode. 11. To market the serial and utilize the FTC given to them, the Petitioners approached Reasonable Advertising Private Limited (“the Respondents”). Negotiations ensued between the parties. Initially, a Memorandum of Understanding was entered into
“10. for the Reasons Recorded HereIn Above We Vs. State of Punjab an ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
relief claimed by the petitioner has been set aside. It has been held as under:- “10. For the reasons recorded herein above, we are of the opinion that the view taken by the learned Single Judge in
of Family Pension. No Rationale or Reason Has Either Been Disclosed in ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
decided by the Division Bench of this Court on 20.1.1998 in case. The Bench upheld the claim for reasons which are best quoted. Paragraphs 7 to 10 of the judgment read as follows:“7. It is not disputed
(A) That a Suit Must Fail by Reason of Some Vs. Pseb and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-09-2013
the minot or such other person. (3) Where the Court is satisfied,- (a) that a suit must fail by reason of some formal defect, or (b) that there are sufficient grounds for allowing the plaintiff to institute a fresh
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free