In Respect Of - Judgment Search Results

In Respect of Shri Ravinder Pal Singh Sidhu, Chairman, Punjab Public S ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC788; 2003(1)AWC653(SC); 95(2003)CLT473(SC); [2003(96)FLR682]; JT2003(1)SC101; 2003(1)SCALE115; (2003)2SCC147; [2003]1SCR91; 2003(1)LC302(SC)

Matched in: Parties In Respect of Shri Ravinder Pal Singh Sidhu, Chairman, Punjab Public Service Commission

“after Hearing Respective Contentions of Both Vs.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

dated 05.07.2011 (Annexure P-6).The Court of Revision while dismissing the revision petition has observed as under:- “After hearing respective contentions of both the sides and also having gone through the record carefully it is found that the

“with Due Respect It Is Stated That the Mother of the Applicant Is I ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

inquiry leading to dismissal from service was made through letter dated 2.3.2000 which reads as follows: “With due respect it is stated that the mother of the applicant is ill and she is getting treatment from S.R.Hospital,

Respectively on the Premise That their Residential Vs. Smt.Murti Devi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.90 of 2014 Date of Decision: January 09, 2014 Smt.Murti Devi and others .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM :...

“with Due Respect It Is Submitted That I Have Received Vs. State of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

order dated 01.10.2013, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned Court below to get their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The said Court was also directed to send a detailed report

Periyar Self-respect Propaganda Institution, Trichy and ors. Vs. State ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1988Mad27

its formation, obtained the recognition of the Government under the Rules prescribed in that behalf, or (b) recognition in respect of which has been refused or withdrawn by the Government under the said Rules.'This Court held : -'It is

The Self-respect Sangam, Erode by President, E.V. Ramaswami Naicker Vs ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1970)1MLJ367

appeal memo.The parties are agreeable to a remand, and the principles of the Indian Partition Act are applied in respect of the property.2. On the basis of this endorsement the matter was remanded again to the trial Court for … co-owners of the entire joint property is converted into separate title and possession of each of the co-owners in respect of specific item or items. The joint property is divided in specie and each of the erst-while joint owners

K. Rajamanickam (D) and anr. Vs. Periyar Self Respect Propaganda Insti ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2007Mad25

defendant Institution is a Trust. It was further submitted that the order in the above C.R.P. was only in respect of the correctness of the leave granted under Section 92, CPC; but what we are now dealing with is … we are now dealing with is about the maintainability of the suit. According to the counsel, any order in respect of the issue of leave to grant may not form an impediment on the principle of res judicata in

Chatur Bhuj Pandey @ Pappu Pandey Vs. Respective Statements with Regar ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

affected parties were directed to appear on 08.05.2013, before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurgaon, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The said Court also directed to send a detailed report in

Present:- Mr. Chetan Mittal Sr. Advocate with Vs. their Respective Rig ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

it appears desirable to obtain a fact-finding report from the civil court as to whether “any oral tenancy in respect of the remaining half portion of the ground floor of SCO No.321-322, Sector 35-D, Chandigarh was entered into between … the parties are not ad-idem on the rate of rent. The disputes half portion of the ground floor, in respect of which respondent No.2 is now claiming oral tenancy, was earlier admittedly occupied by respondent No.1 as a tenant,