Weaker Sections - Judgment Search Results

Muthamizh Nagar Weaker Sections Welfare Sangham Vs. Government of Tami ...

Court: Chennai

AT MADRAS DATED :09. 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR Writ Petition No.37616 of 2007 Muthamizh Nagar Weaker Sections Welfare Sangham, rep., by its Secretary, Mr.M.K.Alauddin. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep., by its … to 5: Mr.M.S.Ramesh Addl. Govt. Pleader For Respondent -2 : Mr.N.Doraikannan O R D E R Muthamizh Nagar Weaker Sections Welfare Sangham (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner-Sangham) has brought forth this Writ Petition under Article 226 of

Economically Weaker Section of Society Houses Welfare Association Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2003)133PLR630

S.S. Saron, J. 1. Petitioner-Economically Weaker Section of Society Houses Welfare Association (for short the 'Association'), is a registered Association and in this petition … S.S. Saron, J. 1. Petitioner-Economically Weaker Section of Society Houses Welfare Association (for short the 'Association'), is a registered Association and in this petition prays

The Scheduled Caste and Weaker Section Welfare Association (Regd.) and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC1117; JT1991(2)SC184; (1991)2SCC604; [1991]1SCR974; 1991(1)LC628(SC)

shall now consider the argument that the State Government had no power to rescind the notification issued under Sections 3 and 11 in the absence of any specific provision in the Act. Section 21 of the General

Vijayawada Urban Zilla Weaker Section and Economically Backward Classe ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1996AP80

No. 1156 Revenue (UCI) Department, dated 20-12-1991 assigning in extent of 20,477 Sq. metres to Vijayawada Urban Zilla Weaker Sections and Economically Backward Classes Society, Vijayawada, hereinafter called as 'the EBC Society', to enable them to divide the … can be allotted to Co-operative Housing Societies in which not less than 75% of the members belong to weaker sections, Class IV, low income and middle income groups in the order of priority to the extent of 75%