Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sudhir Kumar and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Sudhir Kumar and ors. vs Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Disposition Petition allowed Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 12, 2006
~6 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/519968

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P. (S) No. 174 of 2004
Subject
Service
Disposition
Petition allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Law-Pay Scale-CCS (Revised Payscale) Rules, 1997-Claim for placement in Part B of First Schedule of Rules and not under Part A, on basis of qualification-Separate pay-scales have been notified under Part B for Diploma Engineers-Once Govt. of India has accepted recommendations of 5th Pay-Revision Commission a...

Key legal issue
Service
Outcome / disposition
Petition allowed
Acts & sections
C.C.S. (RP) Rules, 1997

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sudhir Kumar and ors.

Advocate Sujit Narayan Prasad, Adv.

Respondent

Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Advocate Faizur Rahman, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and; S.K. Prasad, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5

Legal References

Acts
C.C.S. (RP) Rules, 1997
Reported In
[2007(1)JCR135(Jhr)]

Excerpt

service law-pay scale-ccs (revised payscale) rules, 1997-claim for placement in part b of first schedule of rules and not under part a, on basis of qualification-separate pay-scales have been notified under part b for diploma engineers-once govt. of india has accepted recommendations of 5th pay-revision commission and consequently notified pay revision rules, it cannot deviate from that and suggest a different pay-scale-petition partly allowed. - constitution of india. articles 12 & 226: [m. karpaga vinayagam, c.j., narendra nath tiwari & d.p.singh, jj] writ petition - maintainability - whether state co-operative milk producers federation ltd., is a state within meaning of article 12 ? - held, from perusal of relevant rules of byelaws, it is clear that state government has no role to play either in policy decision for raising funds for federation or its expenditure and thus have no financial control. further there is nothing to indicate that government has any functional and administrative control over federation. state government has no role to play in matter of appointment of any of officials of federation including managing director. federation is totally independent in all respects and in no way subservient to state government in conduct of its business. federation in no way can be termed as agency of state government and does not come within meaning of article 12 of constitution. writ petitions against federation is not maintainable. - we have also recommended specific pay structure for different engineering cadres. once, the government of india has accepted the recommendations of the 5th pay-revision commission and consequently notified the pay revision rules, it cannot deviate from that and suggest a different pay-scale or lower pay-scale than recommended......it is further clarified that the existing pay-scale of rs. 1400-2300/- under ccs (revised pay) rules, 1997, part b of the first schedule, is to be revised in the pay-scale of rs. 5,000-8,000/- for diploma engineers.4. under the ccs (revised pay-scale) rules, 1997, diploma engineer's pay is specified in part b, being technical post and the existing pay-scales of rs. 1400-2300/- has been revised to rs. 5,000-8,000/-.5. petitioners' claim that they be firstly placed in the pay-scale of rs. 1600-2660/- and then in the pay-scale of rs. 5500-9,000/-, cannot be accepted. pay-scale of rs. 1400-2660/- has been proposed and is meant to be allowed at the time of initial recruitment as per para 50.23 of the recommendations of 5th pay revision commission (under lined portion). when these recommendations were accepted by the government, petitioners were already in service and their initial pay-scale was rs. 1400-2300/- and, therefore, by virtue of the revision of the pay-scale as contained in part b of the ccs (rp) rules, 1997, they are to be placed in the pay-scale of rs. 5000-8,000/- the respondent's assertion that petitioners are governed by part-a of these rules and the pay-scale specified therein also cannot be accepted in view of para 50.24 which clarifies the position. separate pay-scales have been notified under part b for the diploma engineers and they are governed by the these pay-scales notwithstanding (sic) government of india to the contrary. once, the government of india has accepted the recommendations of the 5th pay-revision commission and consequently notified the pay revision rules, it cannot deviate from that and suggest a different pay-scale or lower pay-scale than recommended.6. this writ petition is, accordingly, allowed partially with a direction to the respondents to place the petitioners in the pay-scale of rs. 5,000-8,000/- being diploma holder engineers with effect from the date, the revised rules have come into operation i.e. 01.01.1996 and.....

Full Judgment

Permod Kohli, J.

1. Respondent No. 3 is a registered society wholly governed and controlled by the Government of India, Ministry of Human Resources and Development. Petitioner No. 1 joined the services of the Society-Respondent No. 3 on the post of Technical Assistant (Civil) on 03rd of April, 1996 whereas, petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 on being appointed to the post of Technical Assistant (Mechanical) joined on 21st of March, 1997. They were placed in the pay-scale of Rs. 1400-2300/-. The qualification prescribed for the posts in question was Bachelor's degree from a recognized university with Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry or 3 years Diploma having 2 years Laboratory/Workshop experience or I.Sc. with all around Workshop/Laboratory Training and minimum 5 years in Mechanical/Erection work. It is alleged that petitioners were qualified to hold the posts being Diploma Engineers and, accordingly, they were appointed to the posts. The 5th Pay Commission was constituted in the year 1994 and submitted its report on 30th of January, 1997. The Union of India accepted the recommendations of the 5th Pay Commission on 18th of July, 1997. It is alleged that Respondent No. 3 has implemented the 5th pay Commission Report and the pay-scales as shown in Part 1 of the First Schedule of the C.C.S. (RP) Rules, 1997 in respect to the petitioners and their pay-scales has been revised from 1400-2300 to 4500-7,000/-. The grievance of the petitioners is that under the 05th Pay Commission Recommendations and the acceptance order, whereby Pay-Rules have been notified, petitioners are required to be placed in Part B of the First Schedule of C.C.S. (RP) Rules, 1997 and not under Part A on the basis of their qualification. They, accordingly, seek a direction for their placement firstly in the pay-scale of Rs. 1600-2660/- to be revised to pay-scale of Rs. 5500-9000/-. Respondent No. 1 as also the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 have filed their separate disclaimers to this writ petition justifying the placement of the petitioner in the pay-scale of Rs. 4,500-7,000/- as specified in Part A of the Schedule 1 of the CCS (RP) Rules on the basis of the Government of India, Ministry of Human Resources & Development Department of Education, Office Memorandum dated 08th of December, 1997. In this Memo a direction was issued to all the statutory bodies set up and funded/controlled by the State Government to place their employees in the revised pay-scale in Part 1 of the First Schedule of the CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997. Though it is specifically mentioned that the recommendations of the 05th Pay Commission have been accepted and applied to all autonomous organizations, statutory bodies whose pattern of emolument structure i.e. pay scales and all other allowances are identical to those of the Central Government employees. Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 have, accordingly, submitted that they have adopted the pay-scales as directed by the Government of India and they have no discretion to deviate from the directions issued by the Government of India. Respondent No. 3 is wholly funded and controlled by the Government of India. Only question, requires determination in this case, is whether the petitioners are entitled to be placed in the pay-scales of Rs. 1400-2300/- contained in Part 1 of the C.C.S. (Pay-Revision) Rules of 1997 under part B of the said Rules.

2. With a view to appreciate the contention of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, it is useful to refer to the relevant extracts from the said Rules:

The First Schedule containing Part 3, Part A reads as under:

Revised scales for posts carrying present scales in Group 'A', 'B', 'C' & 'D' except posts for which different revised scales are notified separately.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________SL. POST/ PRESENT REVISED No. GRADE SCALE (Rs.) SCALE (Rs.)_______________________________________________________________________1. 2. 3. 4._______________________________________________________________________8. S-8 1350-30-1440-40-1800-50-2200 4500-125-70001400-40-1800-50-2300 Part-B

REVISED PAY SCALES FOR CERTAIN COMMON

CATEGORIES OF STAFF

IX. SUBORDINATE ENGINEERING CADRES

(a) Diploma Engineers 1400-40-1800-50-23005000-150-8000 50.23 &50.241600-50-23-60-26605500-175-9000 50.23Clause 50.23 and 50.24 reads as under:

50.23 We have carefully considered the demands of the Federation and the view of the administrative Ministries/Departments in the light of our general approach on the pay scales of different professional/technical groups of staff and existing relativities between technical and non-technical categories. We have, as a general rule, decided to improve the initial recruitment pay scale of diploma engineers in government. We, accordingly, recommend following pay structure for engineering subordinate cadres:

Existing Proposed (in present terms)(Rs.) (Rs.)1400-2300 1600-2660some of these are graduates in engineering, others are diploma holders.

50.24 These pay scales will apply mutates-mutandis for diploma engineers in different cadres depending upon the availability of specific existing pay scales. We have also recommended specific pay structure for different engineering cadres.

3. Even the Respondent No. 3 also sought some clarification from the Ministry of Human Resources and Development regarding the pay-scales for the Diploma Engineers and the reply on 16th October, 2003 was received, whereunder it is specifically mentioned that on the basis of 05th Pay Revision Commission's Report, Diploma Engineers in different cadres having an existing pay-scale of Rs. 1400-2300/- are to be replaced in the pay-scale of Rs. 1600-2660/-, which is to be replaced by pay-scale of Rs. 5000-8000/-. It is further clarified that the existing pay-scale of Rs. 1400-2300/- under CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997, Part B of the First Schedule, is to be revised in the pay-scale of Rs. 5,000-8,000/- for Diploma Engineers.

4. Under the CCS (Revised Pay-Scale) Rules, 1997, Diploma Engineer's pay is specified in Part B, being Technical post and the existing pay-scales of Rs. 1400-2300/- has been revised to Rs. 5,000-8,000/-.

5. Petitioners' claim that they be firstly placed in the pay-scale of Rs. 1600-2660/- and then in the pay-scale of Rs. 5500-9,000/-, cannot be accepted. Pay-scale of Rs. 1400-2660/- has been proposed and is meant to be allowed at the time of initial recruitment as per Para 50.23 of the recommendations of 5th Pay Revision Commission (under lined portion). When these recommendations were accepted by the Government, petitioners were already in service and their initial pay-scale was Rs. 1400-2300/- and, therefore, by virtue of the revision of the pay-scale as contained in part B of the CCS (RP) Rules, 1997, they are to be placed in the pay-scale of Rs. 5000-8,000/- The Respondent's assertion that petitioners are governed by Part-A of these Rules and the pay-scale specified therein also cannot be accepted in view of Para 50.24 which clarifies the position. Separate pay-scales have been notified under Part B for the Diploma Engineers and they are governed by the these Pay-scales notwithstanding (sic) Government of India to the contrary. Once, the Government of India has accepted the recommendations of the 5th Pay-Revision Commission and consequently notified the Pay Revision Rules, it cannot deviate from that and suggest a different pay-scale or lower pay-scale than recommended.

6. This writ petition is, accordingly, allowed partially with a direction to the respondents to place the petitioners in the pay-scale of Rs. 5,000-8,000/- being Diploma holder Engineers with effect from the date, the revised Rules have come into operation i.e. 01.01.1996 and effective from 01.04.1997. Needless to say that petitioners are entitled to interest @ 6% for the intervening period on the differential amount.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial