Advanced Search Results

Zee Telefilms Ltd. and Star India Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(110)ECC582

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Gujarat Chem. Port Terminal Co. Vs. C.C.E. and C.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)9STR386

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Tata Teleservices Limited and Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)6CompLJ1TelecomDSAT

on receipt of the said letter. Further the petitioners were asked to stop the operation of the WALKY service using numbering levels of fixed services without paying the IUC charges, including ADC, applicable to Limited Mobility Services

In Re: Investigation Into Initial

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Service Tax

Technologies Ltd. IPO New Delhi Television Ltd. IPO Vishal Exports Overseas Limited IPO (Offer for Sale) Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. IPO Indiabulls Financial Services Ltd. IPO Crew B. O. S. Products Ltd. IPO MSK Projects (India) Ltd.

Rana Abhai Singh Vs. the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Patna and ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 437(6); Bihar Service Code, 1952 - Rules 56, 73, 74 and 74(3); Bihar Judicial Officers (Retirement on Superannuation) Rules, 2004; Patna High Court Rules, 1916 - Rules 1, 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226, 235 and 309

the petitioner, who was working at the relevant time, as District & Sessions Judge, in the Superior Judicial Service, in the State of Bihar, in terms of the provisions of Rule 74(b)(ii) of the Bihar Service Code,

Ranjit Prasad Sinha Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : ServiceCivil

rupees ten lacs to him.2. The petitioner asserts that he was appointed as Munsif in the Bihar Civil Service (Judical Branch) in the year 1958 and was promoted as an Additional Subordinate Judge, in July, 1972, he

Bibekananda Das Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 31(2), 32, 162, 226 and 309; Assam Police Service Rules, 1966 - Rules 2, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1), 5(1)(6), 6, 7, 7(1), 7(4) to 7(7), 8, 8(1), 8(1)(6), 8(2), 10, 13, 14, 18, 18(1), 19, 22, 23, 29 and 56; Assam Police Service (Recruitment) Rules - Rule 5(1); Assam Executive Business Rules, 1968 - Rules 10(1), 10(2) and 17; Assam Administrative Tribunal Act, 1977 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5 and 5(1); Assam Police Service Regulations - Regulation 3, 3(1) and 3(4A); Limitation Act; Kerala General Sales Tax Act - Sections 8 and 10; Residuary Rules - Rule 3; Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission (Limitation of Functions) Regulations, 1957 - Regulation 4; Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 - Rules 5, 23 and 37;

be determined by the Court, the irregular or illegal appointee has already put in sufficiently long period of service. In such a situation, there is a conflict of interest. The ideal solution to such a problem lies

Dr. Ksh. Basanta Vs. T. Gomti Devi

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Manipur Health Service Rule, 1982; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

and 1226 of 1998. The controversy between the Medical Officers appointed in Grade IV of the Manipur Health Services on ad hoc basis in one side and the unemployed Doctors who applied for direct recruitment through Manipur

M.R. Kulkarni and ors. Vs. Bank of Maharashtra, Nationalised Bank Cons ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ServiceLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 217 and 226; Bank of Maharashtra Officers Service Regulation, 1979 - Regulation 2, 3, 19 and 20(2); Maharashtra Employees' Provident Fund Rules - Rule 2; Bank of Maharashtra (Employees') Pension Regulations 1995 - Regulation 20(2), 22, 22(1), 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 31, 31(1), 32, 33 and 34(1); Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Sections 12(2) and 19; Bank of Maharashtra Employees' Pension Regulations, 1955 - Regulation 29(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 18(1); Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957; Central Civil Service Rules - Rule 26; Reserve Bank of India Staff Regulations, 1948 - Regulations 16, 26 and 26(3A); Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Bank of

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR612; 2004(5)BomCR743; (2004)IILLJ1007Bom

Rebello, J.1. The petitioners before this Court are the ex-employees of respondent bank. They have resigned from the services of respondent No. 1 between 28th February, 1987 and 1st August, 1992. They have put in services ranging

Anami Narayan Roy, Indian Inhabitant and ors. Vs. Suprakash Chakravart ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 6, 8 and 8A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 32, 141, 142, 144, 164(1A), 245, 246 and 311; Advocates Act, 1961; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 4A; Prevention of Corruption Act; Indian Police Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1954; India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 - Rules 3, 3(2), 6 and 7(1); Indian Police Services (Cadre) Rules, 1954; Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Services) Rules, 1981; All India Services (Deathcum Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16 and 16(1A); Indian Police Service (Pay) Rules, 1954 - Rule 3(2A); Central Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 10 and 10(5); Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR221; 2009(111)BomLR869

Administrative Tribunal, Bombay Bench, Mumbai stating that he is an Officer from 1972 Batch of the Indian Police Service (IPS) and till date he has served in distinguished capacity in various ranks of the police force and