State Government - Judgment Search Results
State (Government of Nct of Delhi) Vs. Nitin Gunwant Shah
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-16-2015
person himself and if any discrepancy arises, the same cannot be relied upon. This Court in Atbir v. Government of NCT of Delhi [1]. has summarized the principles laid down earlier, as under:“(i) Dying declaration can be … filed by the respondents herein and acquitted both of them.2. The facts giving rise to these appeals, briefly stated, are that in the morning of August 2, 1992, when one Lalit Suneja was returning to his house
State Government of M.P. and ors. Vs. Shankarlal
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-13-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)AWC957(SC); [2008(116)FLR982]; (2008)IILLJ289SC; 2007(14)SCALE419; (2008)2SCC55; 2008AIRSCW115; 2008LABIC442; 2007(8)Supreme411; 2008(1)LH(SC)161
Matched in: Parties State Government of M.P. and ors. Vs. Shankarlal
Bihar State Government Secondary School Teachers Association. Vs. Biha ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
proposals should come into effect from 1st January, 1977.6. The recommendations of the committee were accepted by the State Government, and the State Government (Finance Department) issued a notification dated 11.4.1977, which was subsequently published in the Gazette … effect from 1st January, 1977.6. The recommendations of the committee were accepted by the State Government, and the State Government (Finance Department) issued a notification dated 11.4.1977, which was subsequently published in the Gazette Extra-Ordinary on 27.4.1977. The
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Karnataka State Government First Grade Colleges Part-Time Lecturers' A ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-11-1995
Reported in: JT1995(9)SC592; 1995(5)SCALE438; 1995Supp(3)SCC631; [1995]Supp3SCR532
ORDER1. It is stated in the rejoinder-affidavit that a sub-committee has been constituted by the State Government to consider the grievances of the part-time lecturers and the cases of all such persons would be considered
State Government Pensioners' Association and Ors. Vs. State of Andhra ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-25-1986
Reported in: AIR1986SC1907; 1986LabIC1803; 1986(2)SCALE138; (1986)3SCC501; [1986]3SCR383; 1986(2)LC473(SC)
would ipso facto apply for refusing to grant the revised gratuity, since that would amount to asking the State Government to pay arrears relating to gratuity after revising them according to the new scheme for those that retired … of those Rules from 1-4-1978. The scheme is prospective and not retrospective.Moreover, we must remember that when the State Government appointed the Pay Revision Commissioner to review the then existing scales of pay under G.O. Ms. No. 745,
The State Government, Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramkrishna Ganpatrao Limsey a ... Overruled
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-19-1952
Reported in: AIR1954SC20
by fraud.6. The question, therefore, that requires consideration is whether this is a case of that description. The State Government attacked the judgment of the High Court on the ground of its perversity. After hearing the learned Advocate
State Government Gazetted Officers Co-operative House Building Society ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-2008
Reported in: AIR2009AP53; 2009(5)ALT130
Matched in: Parties State Government Gazetted Officers Co-operative House Building Society Vs. Deputy Registrar of Co-op. Societies and anr.
State (Government of Nct of Delhi) Vs. Dr. Anil Khetrapal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2006
Reported in: 131(2006)DLT507; 2006(98)DRJ235
Matched in: Parties State (Government of Nct of Delhi) Vs. Dr. Anil Khetrapal
State Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary, Health and Fami ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2006
Reported in: (2006)2MLJ465
By the Government Letter No. 82 P & AR Department dated 30.03.1994 guidelines have been issued by the State Government in the matter of re-employment of retired government servants. The letter is reproduced below: From Thiru M. Ahmed, … for the Drug Testing Laboratory, Chennai. It is claimed that keeping in view of all these factors, the State Government has decided to grant extension to the 3rd respondent for a period of one year. 8. We have
Tamilnadu State Government Transport Corporation Vs. the State of Tami ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-2011
Matched in: Parties Tamilnadu State Government Transport Corporation Vs. the State of Tamilnadu and ors.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free