Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

The Service - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 17 1957

Service Vs. Dulles

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-17-1957

Service v. Dulles - 354 U.S. 363 (1957) U.S. Supreme Court Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 (1957) Service


Oct 31 2018

Vodafone Mobile Services Limited vs.commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-31-2018

specified for the purpose; CEAC122016 and other connected matter Page 5 of 67 (b) That in case of the service provider, the goods should be used for providing output service.4. The Revenue alleged that CENVAT Credit availed by … "Capital goods" and Rule 2(k) which defines "input"). They argued that Rule 3(1) of the Credit Rules allows the service provider to take credit of the excise duties paid on any "inputs" and "capital goods". They argued that


Feb 23 2024

Neduvathoor Service Co-Op.Bank Ltd vs Puthur Service Co-Op.Bank

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-23-2024

FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 4TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 26501 OF 2015 PETITIONER/S: NEDUVATHOOR SERVICE CO-OP.BANK LTD NO.3856, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, NEDUVATHOOR, NELESWARAM P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN SRI.C.P.SABARI SMT.I.VINAYAKUMARI RESPONDENT/S: 1 PUTHUR SERVICE


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 30 2024

Urakam Nair Service Society @ Urakam Nss Karayogam vs Nair Service Soc ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-30-2024

05.01.2024 IN I.A NO.3/2023 IN CMA NO.99 OF 2023 OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR PETITIONER/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: URAKAM NAIR SERVICE SOCIETY @ URAKAM NSS KARAYOGAM P.O.URAKAM, THRISSUR REPRESENTED BY PRESIDENT KORAMBATH GOPINATHAN. PIN - 680562 BY ADVS. M.P.ASHOK


Jan 02 2026

Illam Hospitality Services Private Limited vs Tata Consultancy Service ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-02-2026

C.M.P.No.32570 of 2025 in APPEAL (CAD) SR.No.190514/2025C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.ANDK.KUMARESH BABU,J.This petition to dispense with the production of the certified copy of thejudgment and decree, dated 18.06.2025,in I.A.No.5 of 2025 in COS.No.268 of 2023, on the file of Additional...


Apr 07 2026

Illam Hospitality Services Private Limited vs Tata Consultancy Service ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-07-2026

in and This miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 49 days in filing the Appeal against the Counter Claim by the Additional Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai, made in I.A.No.05/2025 in C.O.S.No.268 of 2023,...


Jun 06 2025

Guardian Healthcare Services Private Limited vs Counfreedise Retail Se ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-06-2025

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 575 OF 2024 BETWEEN: GUARDIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BRADY HOUSE 3RD


Jan 14 2013

Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. Consulting Engineering Services (i) Pv ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-14-2013

High Court is that the effective rate of service tax would be based on the date on which the service is provided and not the date of billing.5. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the view … binding on this Court and based upon this submission he sought to place reliance on Rule 5B of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. He also placed reliance on Rule 4(a)(i) of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 as


Apr 03 2013

Foxteq Services India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-03-2013

cause notices dated 23.4.2008 and 20.3.2009 to the appellant demanding an amount of Rs.2,03,97,252/- and 50,47,451/- respectively towards the service tax, Education Cess etc., for two different periods. The appellant filed a detailed reply and denied their liability. … entire consideration received by the appellant had suffered VAT/Sales Tax and once the transaction had suffered such levy, the service tax ought to be levied after excluding the value in view of notification No. 12/2003. He also submitted


Jun 27 2013

Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. Sangamitra Services Agency

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-27-2013

only on the gross amount of remuneration or commission would be paid to them by their principals for the service of clearing and forwarding ; since the expenses were incurred by the assessee and reimbursed to them by … forwarding ; since the expenses were incurred by the assessee and reimbursed to them by their principals for the service of clearing and forwarding of excisable goods, the same could not enter into the taxable value under Rule


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial