Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ravi Electricals Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Ravi Electricals vs Union of India (Uoi)

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Jul 06, 1995
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/486044

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 501 of 1979
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Excise
Acts & sections
Central Excise Act, 1944

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ravi Electricals

Advocate V.B. Upadhya, Sr. Counsel

Respondent

Union of India (Uoi)

Advocate None

Legal References

Reported In
1996(82)ELT209(All)

Excerpt

- order1. heard shri v.b. upadhya, learned senior counsel for the petitioner. none appears for the respondents - the union of india and the superintendent of central excise, varanasi.2. by this petition, the petitioner seeks a writ order or direction in the nature of cerliorari quashing the impugned order dated 17-10-1979 passed by the superintendent of central excise, varanasi (respondent no. 2). the impugned order is contained in annexure 11 to this petition.3. without entering into the merits of the case, at the very outset we may point out that the superintendent of central excise while exercising its quasi-judicial power under the central excise act has passed the impugned order dated 17-10-1979 contained in annexure 11 to this petition without assigning any reason as to how the petitioner is not entitled for the benefit of exemption. the order passed is in a very cryptic manner and is non-speaking assigning no reason for arriving at the decision. thus on this score alone the impugned order contained in annexure 11 to this petition deserves to be set aside.4. consequently the impugned order dated 17-10-1979 is quashed and the case is remanded to the authority concerned to decide it after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the parties expeditiously in accordance with law. the stay order dated 13-11-1979 stands vacated.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. Heard Shri V.B. Upadhya, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents - the Union of India and the Superintendent of Central Excise, Varanasi.

2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a writ order or direction in the nature of cerliorari quashing the impugned order dated 17-10-1979 passed by the Superintendent of Central Excise, Varanasi (respondent No. 2). The impugned order is contained in Annexure 11 to this petition.

3. Without entering into the merits of the case, at the very outset we may point out that the Superintendent of Central Excise while exercising its quasi-judicial power under the Central Excise Act has passed the impugned order dated 17-10-1979 contained in Annexure 11 to this petition without assigning any reason as to how the petitioner is not entitled for the benefit of exemption. The order passed is in a very cryptic manner and is non-speaking assigning no reason for arriving at the decision. Thus on this score alone the impugned order contained in Annexure 11 to this petition deserves to be set aside.

4. Consequently the impugned order dated 17-10-1979 is quashed and the case is remanded to the authority concerned to decide it after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the parties expeditiously in accordance with law. The stay order dated 13-11-1979 stands vacated.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial