Advanced Search Results
Gtc Industries Limited and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Aug-11-1986
Excise
Companies Act, 1956; Standard of Weights and Measures Act, 1976; Standard of Weights and Measures (Packed Commodities) Rules, 1977; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 4, 12 and 37; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3(3); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1) and 8(3); Constitution of India - Article 32 and 226
1987(11)ECC33; 1989(23)LC239(Bombay); 1986(25)ELT925(Bom)
stamped with the maximum sale price.2. Cigarettes are subjected to excise duty. The excise duty is leviable in the cigarettes under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKores (India) Limited Vs. Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Nov-17-1980
Excise
1982(10)ELT253(Bom)
two interesting points of considerable importance, viz., (1) Whether any excise duty is at all leviable on teleprinter rolls made by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmpire Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. V.P. Bhide and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-19-1970
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 10, 19, 49, 56A, 96 and 96J; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3
1977(1)ELT34(Bom)
of three different reassessments of and/or claims for payment of excise duty for respective periods of (i) May 26, 1966 to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. the Elphinstone Spinning and Wea ...
Mumbai
Jan-20-1978
ExciseCustom
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 7, 8, 9, 9A and 9(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2, 8(1), 9A, 9A(1), 9A(2), 9A(3), 9A(7), 9A(8) and 9A(9); Provisional collection of Taxes Act, 1931; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 213; Finance Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1956; Custom Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 15 and 25(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975;Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 213; Finance Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1956; Custom Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 15 and 25(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975
1978(2)ELT680(Bom)
of India and the Collector and Assistant Collector of Central Excise against the judgment and order of Rege J. by which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Colfax Laboratories and Another Vs. the State of Goa, Through the ...
Mumbai
Apr-01-1999
Excise
Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 - Sections 2, 3, 6 and 19; Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956 - Rules 11, 12, 60(1) and 68; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10; Companies act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3
1999(3)BomCR704
to as 'the said Act'). The Licensing Authority, Commissioner of Excise, granted licence in Form L-1 on 1st April, 1969, for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.K. Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-17-1984
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(3), 4(4), 11A and 11B; Government of India Act, 1935; Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 2; Sale of Goods Act - Sections 2(10); Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 47, 47(1) and 47(2); Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 10 and 173C
1984(3)ECC292; 1984(18)ELT701(Bom)
paper, The paper manufactured by the petitioners is liable to excise duty under Tariff Item 17 of the First Schedule to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBajaj Auto Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Mumbai
Feb-15-2002
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 11A, 11B, 11D, 35E and 35E(2)
2002(5)BomCR207; 2002LC798(Bombay); 2003(151)ELT23(Bom)
the Petitioners challenge the action of the Respondents in claiming excise duty by redetermining the assessable value by including the amount
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBlue Star Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Mumbai
Jul-01-2003
ExciseLimitation
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 11A and 14
2003(161)ELT141(Bom)
This petition challenges the order of the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay dated 9-8-1989, wherein the Collector has confirmed the demand
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGodrej Industries Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex.
Mumbai
Sep-17-2002
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4), 11D, 12
2003(161)ELT68(Bom)
to this petition is the then Assistant Collector of Central Excise functioning under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 ('the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGodrej Industries Ltd. Vs. D.G. Ahire and anr.
Mumbai
May-02-2002
Excise
Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4)
2003(3)BomCR65
to this petition is the then Assistant Collector of Central Excise functioning under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 ('the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »