Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Subject: excise · Page 1 of about 53,673 results (0.025 seconds)

Aug 11 1986

Gtc Industries Limited and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-11-1986

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Standard of Weights and Measures Act, 1976; Standard of Weights and Measures (Packed Commodities) Rules, 1977; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 4, 12 and 37; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3(3); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1) and 8(3); Constitution of India - Article 32 and 226

Reported in : 1987(11)ECC33; 1989(23)LC239(Bombay); 1986(25)ELT925(Bom)

stamped with the maximum sale price.2. Cigarettes are subjected to excise duty. The excise duty is leviable in the cigarettes under

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 17 1980

Kores (India) Limited Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-17-1980

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1982(10)ELT253(Bom)

two interesting points of considerable importance, viz., (1) Whether any excise duty is at all leviable on teleprinter rolls made by

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 19 1970

Empire Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. V.P. Bhide and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-19-1970

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 10, 19, 49, 56A, 96 and 96J; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1977(1)ELT34(Bom)

of three different reassessments of and/or claims for payment of excise duty for respective periods of (i) May 26, 1966 to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 1978

The Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. the Elphinstone Spinning and Wea ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-20-1978

Subject : ExciseCustom

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 7, 8, 9, 9A and 9(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2, 8(1), 9A, 9A(1), 9A(2), 9A(3), 9A(7), 9A(8) and 9A(9); Provisional collection of Taxes Act, 1931; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 213; Finance Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1956; Custom Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 15 and 25(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975;Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 213; Finance Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1956; Custom Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 15 and 25(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1978(2)ELT680(Bom)

of India and the Collector and Assistant Collector of Central Excise against the judgment and order of Rege J. by which

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 01 1999

M/S. Colfax Laboratories and Another Vs. the State of Goa, Through the ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-01-1999

Subject : Excise

Acts : Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 - Sections 2, 3, 6 and 19; Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956 - Rules 11, 12, 60(1) and 68; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 3; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10; Companies act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1999(3)BomCR704

to as 'the said Act'). The Licensing Authority, Commissioner of Excise, granted licence in Form L-1 on 1st April, 1969, for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 17 1984

B.K. Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-17-1984

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(3), 4(4), 11A and 11B; Government of India Act, 1935; Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 2; Sale of Goods Act - Sections 2(10); Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 47, 47(1) and 47(2); Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 10 and 173C

Reported in : 1984(3)ECC292; 1984(18)ELT701(Bom)

paper, The paper manufactured by the petitioners is liable to excise duty under Tariff Item 17 of the First Schedule to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 15 2002

Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-15-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 11A, 11B, 11D, 35E and 35E(2)

Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR207; 2002LC798(Bombay); 2003(151)ELT23(Bom)

the Petitioners challenge the action of the Respondents in claiming excise duty by redetermining the assessable value by including the amount

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 01 2003

Blue Star Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-01-2003

Subject : ExciseLimitation

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 11A and 14

Reported in : 2003(161)ELT141(Bom)

This petition challenges the order of the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay dated 9-8-1989, wherein the Collector has confirmed the demand

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 17 2002

Godrej Industries Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-17-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4), 11D, 12

Reported in : 2003(161)ELT68(Bom)

to this petition is the then Assistant Collector of Central Excise functioning under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 ('the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 2002

Godrej Industries Ltd. Vs. D.G. Ahire and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-02-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4)

Reported in : 2003(3)BomCR65

to this petition is the then Assistant Collector of Central Excise functioning under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 ('the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial