Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: none · Page 1 of about 103,622 results (0.036 seconds)

May 03 1995

Arjun and anr. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-03-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 374; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 307, 323 and 324

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3797

Advocate for Respondent : Dilip Naik, Dy. Adv. Gen.

D.K. Jain, J.1. In this appeal under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, appellant Arjun son of Mohan...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 04 1991

Dilipkumar Tarachand Gandhi and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-04-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 1992(1)BomCR59

Advocate for Respondent : M.V. Paranjape, Special Public Prosecutor, ; Vijayrao Mohite, Adv. ; S.V. Kulkarni, Adv. Selection grade Public Prosecutor, ; State C.I.D. (Creine), ; Hemant Chavan, Adv. and ; S.G. Page, A.P.P.

M.S. Vaidya, J.1. This appeal is directed against the convictions and sentences awarded on 26-12-1990 by the First Additional Sessions...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 1997

Malhotra International Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Vidyut Metallics Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-14-1997

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 28, 46 and 49; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 10 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 and 92; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398 and 433

Reported in : 1998(1)BomCR351

Advocate for Respondent : Mahendra Shah, ;Aspi Chinoy, ;Salil Shah and ;Rahul Kadam, Advs., i/b H.W. Kane

ORDERS.S. Nijjar, J.1. The facts of this case illustrate what has been so pithily observed by Justice Srikrishna in the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 17 2005

Bombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-2005

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(9A), 2(12), 22, 22A, 29, 31, 31(5), 33, 37, 37(1), 37(1A), 37(1AA), 37(2), 38, 50, 58(1), 125, 126, 126(1), 127, 128 and 149; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 - Sections 3; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 7; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1955; Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 31, 47, 48A, 51A, 141, 142, 226 and 368; Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904-1952;Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 1, 52, 52(4), 53(1), 56, 57, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5), 58(6), 58(7), 58(8), 59(9) and 62(3); Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearan

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The above Petition has been filed in larger public interest, to protect the interests of residents of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 01 2004

A.R. Khan Construwell Company Vs. Youth Education and Welfare Society ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-01-2004

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCommercial

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 36 and 36(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Bombay Public Trusts Rules - Rule 24

Reported in : AIR2005Bom123

Advocate for Respondent : M.H. Shah and ;V.R. Manohar, Sr. Counsels, ;R.V. More, ;S.A. Sawant, ;V.A. Gangal, ;Harshad Deshpande, ;Amit Sakalikar, ;Ulhas Naik and ;Amit Karande, Advs.

V.C. Daga, J.1. These writ petitions have been filed against the common order dated 26th June, 2003 passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 1991

T.M. Chandrasekhar Vs. L.R. Shivaramegowda

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-27-1991

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 8A, 10A, 77, 77 (1) to 77(3), 100, 123, 123(6), 127A and 127A(3); Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rules 86 and 90

Reported in : ILR1992KAR444; 1991(3)KarLJ308

Advocate for Respondent : S. Pramila, Adv. for R-1

ORDERHiremath, J.1. The petitioner in this Election Petition is the son of Sri T.Mariappa a freedom fighter, an ardent and...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 25 2005

The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority and anr. Vs. State o ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-25-2005

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 16, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4), 17(5), 18, 18(1), 18(3), 19(1), 23(1), 23(1A), 23(2), 28, 28A, 28C, 29, 31, 36, 52, 73 and 79B; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5A, 6, 8, 9, 16(2) and 30; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 162, 166, 166(1), 166(3), 226, 243G, 243N, 243P, 243Q, 243R, 243W, 243ZD, 243ZE, 243ZE(3), 243ZF, 245, 246, 254(2), 299, 300A, 309 and 368; Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - Sections 177, 503A, 503B and 503B(7); Karnataka Municipal Corporations (Amendment) Act, 1994; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 95, 95(3) and 95(4); Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 302A; Karnataka Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 45; K

Reported in : ILR2006KAR318; 2006(1)KarLJ1

Advocate for Respondent : K.H. Somasekhar and ;Sumithra G.M., Advs. for Respondent-4 in W.P. No. 51391 of 2004, ;S. Vijayashankar, Senior Counsel and ;C.B. Srinivasan and ;Basavaraj V. Sabarad, Advs. for Respondents-2 and 3 in

N. Kumar, J.1. The appellants-Bangalore Development Authority (for short, 'the BDA'), the State of Karnataka, the former Chief Minister Sri...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 24 1973

In Re: Kril Standard Products Private Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-24-1973

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 6, 20, 23, 23(1), 23(2), 23(3), 26, 37, 235, 370, 370(1B), 391(1), 391(2), 394 and 394A; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 20 and 23

Reported in : [1976]46CompCas203(Guj); (1974)0GLR810

Advocate for Respondent : K.G. Vakharia, Adv.

D.A. Desai, J.1. Kril Standard Products Private Ltd., petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the transferor-company'), has filed this petition under...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 12 2010

The State of Punjab Vs. Manjit Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-12-2010

Subject : Criminal

Hemant Gupta, J.1. This order shall dispose of Murder Reference No. 3 of 2008, Criminal Appeal Nos. 7-DB of 2008...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 1995

Ramkumar Jalan Vs. Income Tax Officer.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-12-1995

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1996)56TTJ(Mumbai)545

ORDERI. S. VERMA, J. M. :All these five appeals are by the assessee against the consolidated order of the CIT(A),...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial