Advanced Search Results
Arjun and anr. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
May-03-1995
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 374; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 307, 323 and 324
1995CriLJ3797
Dilip Naik, Dy. Adv. Gen.
D.K. Jain, J.1. In this appeal under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, appellant Arjun son of Mohan...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDilipkumar Tarachand Gandhi and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Mar-04-1991
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313
1992(1)BomCR59
M.V. Paranjape, Special Public Prosecutor, ; Vijayrao Mohite, Adv. ; S.V. Kulkarni, Adv. Selection grade Public Prosecutor, ; State C.I.D. (Creine), ; Hemant Chavan, Adv. and ; S.G. Page, A.P.P.
M.S. Vaidya, J.1. This appeal is directed against the convictions and sentences awarded on 26-12-1990 by the First Additional Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMalhotra International Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Vidyut Metallics Ltd.
Mumbai
Aug-14-1997
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 28, 46 and 49; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 10 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 and 92; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398 and 433
1998(1)BomCR351
Mahendra Shah, ;Aspi Chinoy, ;Salil Shah and ;Rahul Kadam, Advs., i/b H.W. Kane
ORDERS.S. Nijjar, J.1. The facts of this case illustrate what has been so pithily observed by Justice Srikrishna in the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ...
Mumbai
Oct-17-2005
CivilProperty
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(9A), 2(12), 22, 22A, 29, 31, 31(5), 33, 37, 37(1), 37(1A), 37(1AA), 37(2), 38, 50, 58(1), 125, 126, 126(1), 127, 128 and 149; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 - Sections 3; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 7; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1955; Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 31, 47, 48A, 51A, 141, 142, 226 and 368; Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904-1952;Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 1, 52, 52(4), 53(1), 56, 57, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5), 58(6), 58(7), 58(8), 59(9) and 62(3); Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearan
2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)
S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The above Petition has been filed in larger public interest, to protect the interests of residents of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.R. Khan Construwell Company Vs. Youth Education and Welfare Society ...
Mumbai
Oct-01-2004
Trusts and SocietiesCommercial
Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 36 and 36(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Bombay Public Trusts Rules - Rule 24
AIR2005Bom123
M.H. Shah and ;V.R. Manohar, Sr. Counsels, ;R.V. More, ;S.A. Sawant, ;V.A. Gangal, ;Harshad Deshpande, ;Amit Sakalikar, ;Ulhas Naik and ;Amit Karande, Advs.
V.C. Daga, J.1. These writ petitions have been filed against the common order dated 26th June, 2003 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.M. Chandrasekhar Vs. L.R. Shivaramegowda
Karnataka
Sep-27-1991
Election
Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 8A, 10A, 77, 77 (1) to 77(3), 100, 123, 123(6), 127A and 127A(3); Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rules 86 and 90
ILR1992KAR444; 1991(3)KarLJ308
S. Pramila, Adv. for R-1
ORDERHiremath, J.1. The petitioner in this Election Petition is the son of Sri T.Mariappa a freedom fighter, an ardent and...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority and anr. Vs. State o ...
Karnataka
Nov-25-2005
ConstitutionCivil
Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 16, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4), 17(5), 18, 18(1), 18(3), 19(1), 23(1), 23(1A), 23(2), 28, 28A, 28C, 29, 31, 36, 52, 73 and 79B; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5A, 6, 8, 9, 16(2) and 30; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 162, 166, 166(1), 166(3), 226, 243G, 243N, 243P, 243Q, 243R, 243W, 243ZD, 243ZE, 243ZE(3), 243ZF, 245, 246, 254(2), 299, 300A, 309 and 368; Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - Sections 177, 503A, 503B and 503B(7); Karnataka Municipal Corporations (Amendment) Act, 1994; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 95, 95(3) and 95(4); Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 302A; Karnataka Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 45; K
ILR2006KAR318; 2006(1)KarLJ1
K.H. Somasekhar and ;Sumithra G.M., Advs. for Respondent-4 in W.P. No. 51391 of 2004, ;S. Vijayashankar, Senior Counsel and ;C.B. Srinivasan and ;Basavaraj V. Sabarad, Advs. for Respondents-2 and 3 in
N. Kumar, J.1. The appellants-Bangalore Development Authority (for short, 'the BDA'), the State of Karnataka, the former Chief Minister Sri...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Kril Standard Products Private Ltd.
Gujarat
Aug-24-1973
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 6, 20, 23, 23(1), 23(2), 23(3), 26, 37, 235, 370, 370(1B), 391(1), 391(2), 394 and 394A; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 20 and 23
[1976]46CompCas203(Guj); (1974)0GLR810
K.G. Vakharia, Adv.
D.A. Desai, J.1. Kril Standard Products Private Ltd., petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the transferor-company'), has filed this petition under...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Punjab Vs. Manjit Singh and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
May-12-2010
Criminal
Hemant Gupta, J.1. This order shall dispose of Murder Reference No. 3 of 2008, Criminal Appeal Nos. 7-DB of 2008...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamkumar Jalan Vs. Income Tax Officer.
Mumbai
Dec-12-1995
Direct Taxation
(1996)56TTJ(Mumbai)545
ORDERI. S. VERMA, J. M. :All these five appeals are by the assessee against the consolidated order of the CIT(A),...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »