Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise act 1944 · Page 1 of about 15,653 results (0.095 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 31 2003

Pasupati Fabrics Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-31-2003

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Textile Committee Act, 1963 - Sections 5A(7) and 5D

Reported in : 2003IVAD(Delhi)154; 107(2003)DLT15; 2004(165)ELT35(Del)

of excise as well as whole of the additional duties of excise livable under Section 3 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. He submitted that similar provision existed in the form of Section 5E of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2008

Commissioner of Central Excise, Commissionerate Vs. Vardhman India Pro ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-21-2008

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : [2009]19STT110

its recovery under rule 9(2) read with Rule 57-I(1) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sr. No. Name of the party Amount of duty Amount of duty Balance(M/s.) confirmed as already amount ofper show-cause … and against the assessees.The appeals are disposed of accordingly. Excise - Extension of Period - Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 57A and 57G of Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Respondent-assessee contravened provisions of Rules 57A and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2005

T.T.K.-lig Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-16-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(193)ELT169TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 12 1964

Ahmedabad Silk Factory Private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Guj ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-12-1964

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Laws (Special Exemptions) Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 2(7) and 4; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957; Central Excises Act, 1944

Reported in : (1965)0GLR612; [1966]18STC23(Guj)

'manufacture' was not defined in the Additional Duties of Excise Act but in the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, which is the principal Act dealing with imposition of duties of excise, that expression was defined to include … Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, (hereinafter referred to as the Additional Duties of Excise Act). The Central Government proposed to levy additional duties of excise on certain goods which it considered to be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2006

Vindhyachal Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-29-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2005 - Sections 65(76), 68 and 69; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 and 68(1); Madhya Prades General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995 - Rules 2A and 3(3); Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 4A, 4A(1) and 6; Service Tax (Amendemnt), Rules 1997 - Rule 2; Service Tax Rules, 1944

Reported in : (2007)7VST197(MP)

Matched in: Advocate Kunal Thakre and ;Akshat Sharma, Advs.;H.S. Shrivastava, Sr. Counsel, ;Girish Shrivastava and ;Vijay Raghav Singh, Advs. Dharmendra Sharma, Addl. Solicitor General and ;O.P. Namdeo, GA for UOI, Commissioner, Central Excise and ;Sanjay Yadav, Dy. AG

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 1992

Ralliwolf Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-07-1992

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 4(1) and (4) and 11(B)

Reported in : 1992(2)BomCR262; (1992)94BOMLR91; 1992(59)ELT220(Bom)

petitioners, in or about 1988, the first respondent herein introduced 'self removal procedure' under Chapter VIIA of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. On the introduction of the amendment to Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1963

CochIn Potteries (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-04-1963

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931 - Sections 4; Finance Act, 1961 - Sections 11 and 13; Central Excise Act, 1944; Tariff Act, 1934; ;Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : AIR1964Ker18

- Section 4 of Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931, Sections 11 and 13 of Finance Act, 1961, Central Excise Act, 1944, Tariff Act, 1934 and Section 4 (2) of Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931 - demand made by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2011

Om Prakash and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-30-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 9A, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21; Customs Act, 1962; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 (Cr.P.C.) - Sections 2(a), 155, 436, 173; Evidence Act - Section 25

one relating to the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, and the other involving the provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944, since the issue in both sets of matters is the same. The common question in these two sets … the same. The common question in these two sets of matters is that since all offences under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Customs Act, 1962, are non-cognizable, are such offences bailable? Although, the provisions of both the two

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1981

Kesoram Cements, Basantnagar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-31-1981

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 11 and 173J; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 11B, 11B(1) and 40

Reported in : 1982(10)ELT214(AP)

Matched in: Advocate K. Srinivasa Murthy, Adv. K. Subrahmanya Reddy, Standing-Counsel for Central Government

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2004

Padmanabh Silk Mills Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-07-2004

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226 ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11(2) 11B, 11B(1), 11B(2), 11(BB), 12, 35F; Customs Act - Sections 129E; Central Excise Rule; Central Excises and Customs Laws (Amendment) Act, 1991

Reported in : 2006(193)ELT536(Guj); (2005)1GLR74

the petitioner that they were not entitled to get interest on deposit in this case u/s.11(BB) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which provides for interest for delayed refund of duty and not of deposit. Hence, this petition.6. Shri Dave, … and baseless as, according to the Bombay High Court in respect of deposit made u/s. 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the provision of Section 11B can never be applicable and a deposit u/s. 35F was not a payment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial