Virudambal vs Padmini

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Sep 01, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1905873

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1905873
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar
Decided On: Sep 01, 2025
Case Number: SA/766/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Virudambal

Respondent

Padmini

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 01.09.2025coram:the honourable mr.justice k.rajasekar and c.m.p.no.14857 of 2019 1.virudambal 2.selvam angammal (died) 3.murugesan ... appellants vs. 1.padmini 2.ramadoss ... respondents prayer: second appeal filed under section 100 of the civil procedure code against the judgment and the decree dated 25.01.2019 made in a.s.no.57 of 2014 on the file of the sub court, kallakurichi, reversing the judgment and decree dated 08.07.2014 made in o.s.no.240 of 2007 on the file of the principal district munsif court, kallakurichi. for appellants : no appearance for r1 : mr.n.manokaran for r2 : diedjudgmentit is reported by the learned counsel for the first respondent that, despite his best efforts, he was unable to obtain instructions from the client regarding the steps to be taken in respect of the deceased second respondent.2. this court had already recorded the same submission on an earlier occasion and adjourned the matter finally.3. when the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the first respondent reiterated the same submission, and there was also no representation on behalf of the appellants.4. in view of the fact that the matter has been pending without anyprogress, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. there shall be no order as to costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. ssi index : yes / no speaking order :yes/no neutral citation case : yes/no to: 1.the sub judge, 2.the principal district munsif, k.rajasekar.j, ssi

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR and C.M.P.No.14857 of 2019 1.Virudambal 2.Selvam Angammal (died) 3.Murugesan ... Appellants Vs. 1.Padmini 2.Ramadoss ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and the decree dated 25.01.2019 made in A.S.No.57 of 2014 on the file of the Sub Court, Kallakurichi, reversing the Judgment and decree dated 08.07.2014 made in O.S.No.240 of 2007 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi. For Appellants : No appearance For R1 : Mr.N.Manokaran For R2 : Died

JUDGMENT

It is reported by the learned counsel for the first respondent that, despite his best efforts, he was unable to obtain instructions from the client regarding the steps to be taken in respect of the deceased second respondent.

2. This Court had already recorded the same submission on an earlier occasion and adjourned the matter finally.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the first respondent reiterated the same submission, and there was also no representation on behalf of the appellants.

4. In view of the fact that the matter has been pending without any

progress, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. ssi Index : Yes / No Speaking Order :Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No To: 1.The Sub Judge, 2.The Principal District Munsif, K.RAJASEKAR.J, ssi

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Virudambal vs Padmini Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar

civil procedure Speaking order In respect of On behalf of high court Has been in re