Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Civil Procedure - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 28 2006

Cpc (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Dec-28-2006

Reported in: (2007)7STR191

took me through the impugned order wherein the Commissioner had observed that the Hon'ble Supreme Court had admitted Civil Appeal No.1618/05 filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara 1 on 22" August 2000 within days of … took me through the impugned order wherein the Commissioner had observed that the Hon'ble Supreme Court had admitted Civil Appeal No.1618/05 filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara 1 on 22" August 2000 within days of


Mar 02 2026

Bangarubabu Educational and Charitable Trust represented by Vijayababu ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-02-2026

records in the file of the First Respondent and quash the impugned Intimation of the First Respondent in CPC/2021/A7/164784627 dated 30.11.2021 for the Assessment Year 2020-21 and direct the First Respondent to process the Return of Income … deduction under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be denied merely on the ground of procedural delay in filing Form 10B by the Petitioner.12. At best, the Petitioner can be imposed with cost for


Feb 20 2025

M/S CPC and Sons vs State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-20-2025

THE PERIOD 2015-16 AND 2016-17 (ANNEXURE-N) ISSUED BY RESPONDENT6 TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.14140/2022 BETWEEN M/S. CPC & SONS #195/14, 7TH MAIN V.S.GARDEN, JJR NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 026. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR DILIP KUMAR … THE PERIOD 2015-16 AND 2016-17 (ANNEXURE-N) ISSUED BY RESPONDENT6 TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.14140/2022 BETWEEN M/S. CPC & SONS #195/14, 7TH MAIN V.S.GARDEN, JJR NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 026. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR DILIP KUMAR


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 16 2025

M/S CPC and Sons vs State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-16-2025

S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT APPEAL No. 1062 OF 2025 (T-RES) BETWEEN:1. M/S CPC AND SONS, V. S. GARDEN, JJR NAGAR, BENGALURU 560 026, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, DILIP KUMAR C.M., …APPELLANT … S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT APPEAL No. 1062 OF 2025 (T-RES) BETWEEN:1. M/S CPC AND SONS, V. S. GARDEN, JJR NAGAR, BENGALURU 560 026, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, DILIP KUMAR C.M., …APPELLANT


Sep 10 2025

Prolific Hr Consultants (India) Ltd vs Additional Director of Income T ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-10-2025

(Appeals), by following thejudgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CheckmateServices P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, CivilAppeal No.2833/2016, dated 12.10.2022, dismissed the appeal. The assessee thereafter preferred a further appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal,


Dec 03 2025

Wipro Ge Medical Systems (P) Ltd vs Centralized Processing Center (CPC ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-03-2025

AND:1. CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTER (CPC)INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Digitally signed OF INCOME TAX, CPC by CHANDANA BENGALURU - 560 500 BM Location: High 2. INCOME TAX OFFICER Court of WARD 4(2)(3), Karnataka … AND:1. CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTER (CPC)INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Digitally signed OF INCOME TAX, CPC by CHANDANA BENGALURU - 560 500 BM Location: High 2. INCOME TAX OFFICER Court of WARD 4(2)(3), Karnataka


Feb 28 2024

M/S CPC and Sons vs State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-28-2024

DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.5848 OF 2024 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S. CPC AND SONS #195/14, 7TH MAIN, V S GARDEN, JJR NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 026 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR … DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.5848 OF 2024 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S. CPC AND SONS #195/14, 7TH MAIN, V S GARDEN, JJR NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 026 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR


Feb 04 2013

Dy. Manager Cpc Pltd Vs. Kovai Dist Newdemocratic Labour Front

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-04-2013

and Employment Department, Fort St. George, Chenna”009. 2. Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation)-3, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbator”018. 3. Management, CPC(P) Limited, No.207, Mettupalayam Road, Cheran Nagar, Coimbator”030. .... Respondents in W.P.No.799 of 2013 W.P.No.22069 of 2012: PETITION under … and Employment Department, Fort St. George, Chenna”009. 2. Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation)-3, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbator”018. 3. Management, CPC(P) Limited, No.207, Mettupalayam Road, Cheran Nagar, Coimbator”030. .... Respondents in W.P.No.799 of 2013 W.P.No.22069 of 2012: PETITION under


May 13 1994

In Re: Reference U/S 113 of Civil Procedure Code by District Judge

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-13-1994

Reported in: 1995(0)MPLJ94

Bhat, C.J.1. This reference is made by the District Judge, Jabalpur under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure. We issued notices to the Advocate General, High Court Bar Association and the Jabalpur District Bar Association, indicating … Shri R. P. Jain and the Addl. Advocate General Shri Anoop Choudhary.3. Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short the Code) confers on the High Court what is known as revisional power. The power consists


Sep 09 1942

In Re: Reference Under Order Xlvi, Civil Procedure Code, 1908

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-09-1942

Reported in: AIR1943Bom250; (1943)45BOMLR445

the Subordinate Judge of Khed through the District Judge of Poona under Order XLVI, Rule 1, of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, raising certain questions of law which arise under the Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act of 1939.2. … is so, a reference in respect of difficulties cannot be made under Order XLVI, Rule 1, of the Civil Procedure Code. We have not got the actual plaints before us. In so far as a suit is a


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial