Civil Procedure - Judgment Search Results
Cpc (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Dec-28-2006
Reported in: (2007)7STR191
took me through the impugned order wherein the Commissioner had observed that the Hon'ble Supreme Court had admitted Civil Appeal No.1618/05 filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara 1 on 22" August 2000 within days of … took me through the impugned order wherein the Commissioner had observed that the Hon'ble Supreme Court had admitted Civil Appeal No.1618/05 filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara 1 on 22" August 2000 within days of
Dy. Manager Cpc Pltd Vs. Kovai Dist Newdemocratic Labour Front
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-04-2013
and Employment Department, Fort St. George, Chenna”009. 2. Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation)-3, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbator”018. 3. Management, CPC(P) Limited, No.207, Mettupalayam Road, Cheran Nagar, Coimbator”030. .... Respondents in W.P.No.799 of 2013 W.P.No.22069 of 2012: PETITION under … and Employment Department, Fort St. George, Chenna”009. 2. Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation)-3, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbator”018. 3. Management, CPC(P) Limited, No.207, Mettupalayam Road, Cheran Nagar, Coimbator”030. .... Respondents in W.P.No.799 of 2013 W.P.No.22069 of 2012: PETITION under
In Re: Reference U/S 113 of Civil Procedure Code by District Judge
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-13-1994
Reported in: 1995(0)MPLJ94
Bhat, C.J.1. This reference is made by the District Judge, Jabalpur under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure. We issued notices to the Advocate General, High Court Bar Association and the Jabalpur District Bar Association, indicating … Shri R. P. Jain and the Addl. Advocate General Shri Anoop Choudhary.3. Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short the Code) confers on the High Court what is known as revisional power. The power consists
18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Reference Under Order Xlvi, Civil Procedure Code, 1908
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-09-1942
Reported in: AIR1943Bom250; (1943)45BOMLR445
the Subordinate Judge of Khed through the District Judge of Poona under Order XLVI, Rule 1, of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, raising certain questions of law which arise under the Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act of 1939.2. … is so, a reference in respect of difficulties cannot be made under Order XLVI, Rule 1, of the Civil Procedure Code. We have not got the actual plaints before us. In so far as a suit is a
inntrepreneur Pub Company (Cpc) and Others (Original Appellants and Cr ...
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Jul-19-2006
that the national judge finds that article [81](1) is applicable, he is in a position to determine the civil law effects following from the prohibition set out in article [81](2)…The judge can also award compensation for loss … supplemented by a large number of experts, culminating in a very lengthy trial. This was not an appropriate procedure if it was to be said that the judge should not look beyond the Commission reports. As it
Vinayak Hari Kulkarni, Vs. State of Maharashtra, (Summons to Be Served ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-18-2009
Reported in: 2009(4)MhLj242
Rules framed by this Court under it's rule making power either flow from the Constitution and/or Code or Civil Procedure and Criminal Procedure Code and all other enabling provisions in this respect is a legislative power which requires … under Article 225 of the Constitution of India and Sections 122, 125 and 129 of the Code of Civil Procedure and with all other enabling provisions in this respect provided in the various Statutes. Under Article 225, this
Shri D.K. Rajepandhare, Ex-joint Civil Judge and J.M. Satara Vs. State ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-26-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)ALLMR858; 2005(6)BomCR288; 2005(4)MhLj1067
H.L. Gokhale, J.1. This writ petition filed by a former Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, seeks to challenge the order dated 19th December 2002 passed by the … V.R. Gaikwad practising at Yeola with a view to harass him.(iii) Thirdly, he did not follow the proper procedure while dealing with the criminal matters, particularly those arising under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code and
Dr. Prabhakar J. Lavakare Vs. the State of Maharashtra, (Summons to Be ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-21-2010
Reported in: 2010(112)BomLR1802
Matched in: Parties Dr. Prabhakar J. Lavakare Vs. the State of Maharashtra, (Summons to Be Served on the Learned Government Pleader Appearing for State of Maharashtra Under Order Xxvii, Rule 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908),
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free