On Behalf Of - Judgment Search Results

Reply on Behalf of the Respondent - State Filed in Court Vs. State of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Malwai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurvinder Singh Sidhu, AAG, Haryana. **** Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.(Oral) 1. Reply on behalf of the respondent - State filed in Court today, is taken on record.2. The petitioner, a convict in FIR

State (on Behalf of the Court) Vs. Ajit Singh Jawhar Singh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1971CriLJ1814

Justice B, S. Dhillon whilst dealing with Criminal Miscellaneous No. 502-M of 1971 being a petition for bail on behalf of Jai Gopal and Karnail Singh noticed that the respondent Ajit Singh, who is the main accused in a … of the Sessions Court. Amritsar. it appears that on March 24. 1971, a cryptic bail application was moved on behalf of the respondent Ajit Singh which did not make the slightest reference to the circumstances of the case and

Court on Behalf of the State Vs. Radha Krishna Khanna and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1961P& H113

Matched in: Parties Court on Behalf of the State Vs. Radha Krishna Khanna and anr.

Court on Behalf of the State Vs. Shingara Singh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1963P& H185; 1963CriLJ478

Matched in: Parties Court on Behalf of the State Vs. Shingara Singh

Bansilal on Behalf of Shri Ekling Cotton Ginning and Pressing Factory ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1957Raj326

Modi, J. 1. This is a petition by Bansilal on behalf of Shri Ekling Cotton Ginning and Pressing Factory, Gangapur, under Sub-section 2 of Section 66 of the Indian Income … (from Shri Shankerlal the outgoing partner) by Shri Bansilal Ramrai and Bamnarain was in their individual capacity or on behalf of the Hindu undivided family? 2. Was Shri Bansilai a partner in the asses-see firm in the relevant year

Joseph (on Behalf of the Secretary of State for Indai in Council) Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1894)ILR17Mad371

1. This is a Civil Revision Petition put in on behalf of the Secretary of State in Council under Section 622 of the Civil Procedure Code against the decision of

Quintavalle (on Behalf of Comment on Reproductive Ethics) (Appellant) ...

Court: House of Lords

Matched in: Parties Quintavalle (on Behalf of Comment on Reproductive Ethics) (Appellant) Vs. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (Respondents)

Hicks on Behalf of Feiock Vs. Feiock

Court: US Supreme Court

HICKS ON BEHALF OF FEIOCK v. FEIOCK - 479 U.S. 1305 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court HICKS ON BEHALF OF FEIOCK v. FEIOCK … HICKS ON BEHALF OF FEIOCK v. FEIOCK - 479 U.S. 1305 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court HICKS ON BEHALF OF FEIOCK v. FEIOCK , 479 U.S. 1305 (1986) 479 U.S. 1305 Cecil HICKS, District Attorney for County of

Hrishikesh Nag Iswar Chandra Nag Vs. State on Behalf of K.M. Ghosh

Court: Guwahati

days, The accused Nutan Chandra Ghosh also surrendered in Court on that day. Bail petitions having been moved on behalf of both the accused, the learned Magistrate after hearing the Lawyer for the accused persons as also the Court

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. on Behalf of Monitoring C ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2003(4)AWC3334(SC); JT2003(Suppl1)SC391; 2003(7)SCALE636; (2003)8SCC696

this Court for the action being taken by the Agra Mission Management Board and other authorities. On 25.3.2003 on behalf of the Monitoring Committee a report was submitted before this Court wherein it was prayed that respondents including the … proceeding with construction without clearance from the Central Government.2. Therefore, on 1.5.2003, the Court perused the affidavit filed on behalf of the Union Government and recorded as under:-'Heard the learned counsel for the parties. In the affidavit dated 29.4.2003