Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S.Johnson Vs The District Collector

S.Johnson vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 02, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1689014

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WA(MD)/3237/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Johnson

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high courtcoram:the honourable mr.justice n.sathish kumar and the honourable mr.justice m.jothiraman and c.m.p(md)no.20047 of 2025 s.johnson ... appellant/petitioner vs. 3.anith beuglin 4.nagarajan 5.r.johnson ... respondents/respondents prayer : writ appeal filed under clause 15 of letters patent to set aside the order dated 04.09.2025 made in w.p(md)no.11707 of 2024 on the file of this court. for appellant : mr.s.c.herold singh for respondents : mr.s.p.maharajan special government pleader for r.1 & r.2 : unclaimed (for r.3) : mr.e.j.daniel robinson for r.4 & r.5judgment[judgment of the court was made by n.sathish kumar, j.) when the dictation was halfway through and the court was about to dismiss the writ appeal, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks the permission of this court to withdraw the writ appeal with liberty to proceed with the pending civil suit and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, this writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [n.s.k.,j.] [m.j.r.,j.] 02.03.2026 ncc : yes / no index : yes / no ps ton.sathish kumar,j.andm.jothiraman,j.psorder made in

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN and C.M.P(MD)No.20047 of 2025 S.Johnson ... Appellant/Petitioner vs. 3.Anith Beuglin 4.Nagarajan 5.R.Johnson ... Respondents/Respondents PRAYER : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 04.09.2025 made in W.P(MD)No.11707 of 2024 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader for R.1 & R.2 : Unclaimed (for R.3) : Mr.E.J.Daniel Robinson for R.4 & R.5

JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) When the dictation was halfway through and the Court was about to dismiss the Writ Appeal, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Appeal with liberty to proceed with the pending civil suit and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [N.S.K.,J.] [M.J.R.,J.] 02.03.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No ps To

N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.

and

M.JOTHIRAMAN,J.

ps

ORDER MADE IN

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial