Government Pleader - Judgment Search Results
Government Pleader Vs. the Groundnut Extraction Export Development Ass ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-24-1976
Reported in: (1977)79BOMLR226
of the State by such officer as the State Government may appoint. The State Government has appointed the Government pleader for filing such applications in revision. Under Rule 96 of the Bombay High Court Rules, Original Side, 1957, … by the party aggrieved, that is, either the plaintiff or in the case of the State by the Government pleader.; Where any such dispute or difference about the amount of Court-fees to be payable arises subsequent to the
The Government Pleader, High Court Vs. S.L. Jain
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-22-1965
Reported in: (1965)67BOMLR901
the petition of opponent No. 1 the provisions in Article 34 were not applicable.3. Mr. Abhayankar for the Government Pleader has contended that on a true construction of the provisions in Section 53 of the Insurance Act it
Government Pleader Vs. A.R. Vajiravelu Chetty and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-1955
Reported in: 1956CriLJ475
a successful trap.3. The Superintendent, of the X Branch forwarded the petition to the Chief Secretary to the Government of Madras for necessary action. It was duly sent to the Registrar, High Court of Judicature Madras. The … suits between the ryots and the inamdars of Mundlapudi. The ryots were represented by Sri B. Munirathnam Naidu, Pleader, Tirupathi. This pleader took this judicial officer and his family to Tirumalai hills, fed him and presented him
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Government Pleader Vs. Mathai Manjooran and anr.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-23-1959
Reported in: AIR1959Ker266; 1959CriLJ1075
Vaidialingam, J.1. This is an application filed by the Government Pleader under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Contempt of Courts Act -- Central Act XXXII of l952, … the Malayalam Daily newspaper called 'Kerala Prakasom' printed and published at Ernakulam.3. In the petition filed by the Government Pleader, it is stated that in the issue of the newspaper dated 29-7-1958, the respondents have published a report
The Government Pleader, High Court Vs. Shankar Dattatraya Javadekar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-18-1937
Reported in: AIR1938Bom198; (1938)40BOMLR73
John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. This is an application by the Government Pleader praying that a rule may be issued against the opponent,Mr. Javadekar, editor and printer of a paper called
The Government Pleader, High Court Vs. Tulsidas Subhanrao Jadhav
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-18-1937
Reported in: AIR1938Bom197; (1938)40BOMLR75
John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. This is an application by the Government Pleader asking that a rule may be issued against the respondent, Tulsidas Subhanrao Jadhav, to show cause why he
The Government Pleader Vs. Siddick H. Shaikh
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-26-1929
Reported in: (1929)31BOMLR625; 121Ind.Cas.587
him personally in open Court by the learned District Judge. We further order that he do pay the Government Pleader's costs of this application, Bombay Pleaders Act (Bom. XVII of 1920), Section 26-Pleader- Unprofessional conduct-Advertisement by a
The Government Pleader Vs. L.B. Bhopatkar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-16-1928
Reported in: AIR1928Bom338; (1928)30BOMLR934; 113Ind.Cas.519
his client in a notice under Section 80. But, at the same time, as was pointed out in Government Pleader v. Tatke (1922) 25 Bom. L.R. 264 which in that respect merely follows what has been often laid … same footing as an article in a newspaper, there is a certain amount of publicity involved in such Government Pleader a notice.6. Now, in this notice, 1 think, paragraph 4 is certainly one that Mr. Bhopatkar should have
Government Pleader Bombay Vs. Ramanlal Jethalal Shah
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-18-1934
Reported in: (1934)36BOMLR1225
Macklin, J.1. This is an application by the Government Pleader under Section 25 of the Bombay Pleaders Act made as a result of two applications-to the District Judge
The Government Pleader Vs. Dattatraya Narayan Deshpande
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-04-1928
Reported in: AIR1928Bom385; (1928)30BOMLR1011; 114Ind.Cas.259
is one where there is reason to doubt the advisability of granting such permission, he can ask the Government Pleader to bring it before the Court in its disciplinary jurisdiction. That has been the action taken in the … circumstances show reasonable cause for suspending his sanad during that period.4. We have carefully considered all that the Government Pleader and Dewan Bahadur Rao have placed before us upon this question. But we regret to say we have
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free