Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Set Aside - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 29 1999

Sekhar Chandra Set Vs. Vice-chancellor of the Calcutta University and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-29-1999

Reported in: (2000)10SCC216

Matched in: Parties Sekhar Chandra Set Vs. Vice-chancellor of the Calcutta University and ors.


Aug 22 2008

Set Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd., a Company Incorporated and Registe ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-22-2008

Reported in: (2008)110BOMLR2726; 2008BusLR850(Bom); (2008)218CTR(Bom)452; [2008]307ITR205(Bom)

these hypothetical profits. In our opinion the entire rational or reasoning given by the Tribunal has to be set aside. In matters of tax what has to be considered and more so in international transactions if there be … of the above Appeal filed by the Appellant herein is allowed and the order of the ITAT is set aside. Merely because tax on income was paid for some assessment years would not estop the assesses from contending


May 16 2008

Set Discovery P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-16-2008

Reported in: AIR2008Delhi159; 151(2008)DLT531; 2008(104)DRJ590

notice dated 25th January, 2005.9. Mr. Aditya Narayan, Advocate submitted that the impugned order is liable to be set aside, because it is tantamount to directing that the petitioner does business with a defaulting party, contrary to its


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 17 2013

“we Thus Set-aside the Direction of the Vs. State of Haryana and Oth ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-17-2013

asking of the Court, Mr.Kulvir Narwal,Addl. Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. A complete set of paper book has been supplied to him. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, we


Mar 03 2014

“....Action Plans Set by This Court on Its Administrative Side Vs. A ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-03-2014

test of counter balance, then this Court is of the opinion that the impugned order deserves to be set aside in order to avoid miscarriage of justice. The three official witnesses and one private witness could have been … it is not intended that the plan should be used to thwart justice. If the impugned order is set aside to permit the petitioner to conclude his entire evidence, no prejudice would be caused to the defendants-respondents, and


Feb 01 2005

Set India Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Feb-01-2005

Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 in this application are accused Nos. 6 and 7 in the complaint petition.3. SET India Private Limited through N.P. Singh, Chief Financial Officer, 23, Shah Industrial Estate Off Veera Desai Road, Andheri


Sep 10 2003

Set Discovery Private Limited Vs. Banjara Tele Links Private Limited

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-10-2003

Reported in: 2003(5)ALD644

of right to file reply or of being heard. Not only the impugned order is liable to be set aside on the ground of violation of the principles of natural justice but the same is liable to be … on the ground of violation of the principles of natural justice but the same is liable to be set aside even on merits also. Before that, we will first deal with the objection raised by the respondent about


Apr 30 1997

Dominent Off-set (P) Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-c ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-30-1997

Reported in: (1998)ILLJ64P& H; (1997)116PLR736

of the fact as a justification for taking a particular action against the workman. It is in the set of this legal position, now it is to be seen as to what was the case of the


Jun 19 2002

Mamta Type Setting Works Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jun-19-2002

Reported in: [2004]134TAXMAN34(Guj)

above numbered appeal. The Tribunal accepted the submission of the revenue and allowing the appeals of the revenue, set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and restored the order of the assessing officer.3. At the hearing of


Apr 03 1979

Set Jethanand Tahilram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-03-1979

Reported in: 1979(4)ELT538(Cal)

Matched in: Parties Set Jethanand Tahilram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial