Letters Patent - Judgment Search Results
Letters Patent Appeal No.1292 of 2013(Oandm) Vs. Letters Patent Appeal ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1292 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision : July 25, 2013 State of Haryana and another .....Appellants versus
Letters Patent Appeal No.1526 of 2013(Oandm) Vs. Letters Patent Appeal ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1526 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision : August 26, 2013. State of Punjab and others .....Appellants versus
Letters Patent Appeal No.1502 of 2012(Oandm) Vs. Letters Patent Appeal ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1502 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision : July 23, 2013 The Managing Committee, Guru Nanak Khalsa College … application and condone the delay of 200 days in filing the appeal. LPA No.1502 of 2012 (O&M) This letters patent appeal though assails the order dated 8.2.2012 whereby the learned Single judge directed the appellants to pay a
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Letters Patent Appeal No.1412 of 2013(Oandm) Vs. State of Haryana and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1412 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision : August 12, 2013 State of Haryana and others .....Appellants versus … consideration in this case is whether or not the delay of 316 days in filing of the accompanying letters patent appeal be condoned?. Should there be any accountability of the authorities in the department, we are of the
Letters Patent Appeal No. 379 of 2013 (Oandm) Vs. Rakesh Singh and Oth ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.379 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:21. 08.2013 B.K.Srivastava ..Appellant Versus Rakesh Singh and others ..Respondents CORAM: … SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) CM No.1010 of 2013 Allowed subject to all just exceptions and CM disposed of. Letters Patent Appeal No.379 of 2013 (O&M) The Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the impugned judgment of the learned
Letters Patent Appeal No. 502 of 2012 Vs. Financial Commissioner Reven ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No.502 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No.502 of … LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No.502 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No.502 of 2012 Date of Decision:8. h February, 2013 Meet Ram and others ..Appellants versus Financial Commissioner,
Letters Patent Appeal No.1148 of 2012 Vs. Chief Canal Officer/Lau, Har ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
Letters Patent Appeal No.1148 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1148 of … Letters Patent Appeal No.1148 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1148 of 2012 Date of Decision:24. 1.2013 Hawa Singh ..Appellant versus Chief Canal Officer/LAU, Haryana and others
Letters Patent Appeal No.673 of 2012 Vs. Angrej Kaur and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-16-2013
Letters Patent Appeal No.673 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.673 of … Letters Patent Appeal No.673 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.673 of 2012 Date of Decision:16. 1.2013 Avtar Singh and others ..Appellants Versus Angrej Kaur and others
Letters Patent Appeal No.634 of 2009(Oandm) Vs. State of Haryana and O ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.634 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision : July 04, 2013 State of Haryana and others .....Appellants versus … Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This letters patent appeal is preferred against the order dated 5.2.2008 whereby the learned Single Judge has directed the appellant-State to
Letters Patent Appeal No.1166 of 2013(Oandm) Vs. the State of Haryana ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1166 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision : July 04, 2013 The State of Haryana and another .....Appellants … Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This letters patent appeal must fail on two counts. Firstly, there is a delay of 258 days in its filing. In
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free