Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abhimanyu, vs State of Kerala,

Abhimanyu, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 02, 2022
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1440423

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/82/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abhimanyu,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

.....in c.c. no. 521 of 2019 pending before the judicial first class magistrate's court-i, aluva has moved this court under section 482 of the cr.p.c. seeking to quash the proceedings on the ground of settlement reached with the de facto complainant and other injured, who are respondents 2 and 3. the case was taken on file on the final report in crime no. 328 of 2019 of chengamanad police station registered on 14.09.2019 alleging offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 324 read with 34 of the ipc.2. the crime was registered on the first information statementfurnished by the de facto complainant, the 2 nd respondent. it is alleged that on 13.04.2019 at 11 am while cws 1 and 2, that is respondents 2 and 3 respectively were moving on a motorcycle on kuttiyal-ayiroor road from south to north, near uzhamkadavu bridge, the accused persons wrongfully restrained them and the 1 st petitioner slapped cw2 on his face. then the 2nd petitioner also manhandled him. the 1st petitioner stamped cw1. when cw1 had tried to resist, he was also assaulted. the 3rd petitioner had hit cw1 with a stone and thus caused him grievous hurt. even though the first information report containsoffence under section 326 also, in the final report offences under sections 341, 323 and 324 read with 34 of the ipc alone are incorporated.3. the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case is settled. this has been endorsed by the learned senior public prosecutor and also the learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3.4. moreover annexure 3 and 4 affidavits of the partyrespondents also indicate that the case is settled and both of them do not want to pursue the proceedings. respondents 2 and 3 did not suffer any serious injury in the occurrence; no public interest is involved in the case.5. in the circumstances, accepting the settlement reachedbetween the parties, entire proceedings in c.c. no. 521 of 2019 pending before the judicial first class magistrate's court-i,.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 13TH MAGHA, 1943 (CRIME NO. 328 OF 2019 OF CHENGAMANAD POLICE STATION) AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 521/2019 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I, ALUVA PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO 3:

1 ABHIMANYU S/O. MADHU KUMAR, THETTEMAL HOUSE, AYIROOR P. O., KUNNUKARA VILLAGE, KUNNUKARA DESOM, PARAVUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683579. 2 ANANDHU AGED 24 YEARS S/O. RAJESH, THETTEMAL HOUSE, AYIROOR P. O., KUNNUKARA VILLAGE, 3 BIBIN S/O. SHEKHARAN, CHERUKAD HOUSE, AYIROOR P. O., KUNNUKARA VILLAGE, BY ADV V.S.NEENESHKUMAR

RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT:

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHENGAMANAD POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683578. 2 SANIL AGED 27 YEARS S/O. JALEEL, VATHIYEDATHU HOUSE, ALIKUNNU SOUTH ADUVASSERY P. O., 3 DON VICTOR AGED 26 YEARS S/O. VICTOR EMMANUEL, VIDAYATHIL HOUSE, SOUTH ADUVASSERY P. O., BY ADV K.S.DHANESH KUMAR MT. SREEJA V.

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Accused in C.C. No. 521 of 2019 pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-I, Aluva has moved this Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the proceedings on the ground of settlement reached with the de facto complainant and other injured, who are respondents 2 and 3. The case was taken on file on the final report in Crime No. 328 of 2019 of Chengamanad police station registered on 14.09.2019 alleging offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324 read with 34 of the IPC.

2. The crime was registered on the First Information Statement

furnished by the de facto complainant, the 2 nd respondent. It is alleged that on 13.04.2019 at 11 AM while CWs 1 and 2, that is respondents 2 and 3 respectively were moving on a motorcycle on Kuttiyal-Ayiroor road from south to north, near Uzhamkadavu bridge, the accused persons wrongfully restrained them and the 1 st petitioner slapped CW2 on his face. Then the 2nd petitioner also manhandled him. The 1st petitioner stamped CW1. When CW1 had tried to resist, he was also assaulted. The 3rd petitioner had hit CW1 with a stone and thus caused him grievous hurt. Even though the First Information Report contains

offence under Section 326 also, in the final report offences under Sections 341, 323 and 324 read with 34 of the IPC alone are incorporated.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case is settled. This has been endorsed by the learned Senior Public Prosecutor and also the learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3.

4. Moreover Annexure 3 and 4 affidavits of the party

respondents also indicate that the case is settled and both of them do not want to pursue the proceedings. Respondents 2 and 3 did not suffer any serious injury in the occurrence; no public interest is involved in the case.

5. In the circumstances, accepting the settlement reached

between the parties, entire proceedings in C.C. No. 521 of 2019 pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-I, Aluva are quashed and the petitioners shall stand exonerated. The Criminal Miscellaneous Case is allowed as above. Sd/- K. HARIPAL JUDGE

RMV/02/02/2022 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 82/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT NO.328/2019 DATED 14.04.2019 OF CHENGAMANAD POLICE STATION. Annexure 2 CERTIFIED COPY OF FINAL REPORT DATED 03.05.2019 SUBMITTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHENGAMANAD POLICE STATION. Annexure 3 ORIGINAL OF AFFIDAVIT DATED 23.12.2021 SWORN BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT. Annexure 4 ORIGINAL OF AFFIDAVIT DATED 23.12.2021 SWORN BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial