First Class - Judgment Search Results

New York Vs. Class

Court: US Supreme Court

every heart. Uncontrolled search and seizure is one of the first and most effective weapons in the arsenal of every arbitrary William McNamee observed respondent Page 475 U. S. 108 Benigno Class driving above the speed limit in a car with a

Karans Gurukul Classes & Ors vs.gurukul Classes Iit Division & Ors

Court: Delhi

and are carrying on their business at Railway Station Road, First Floor, Sarda Arcade, above Syndicate Bank, Padampura, Aurangabad, Maharashtra-431001 and Nos.1399868 in Class 41, 3498632 in Class 41, 3498623 in Class 42 and 3498626 in Class 41 are invalid and liable

Class Iv Employees Association, High Court of Judicature, Through, Its ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1998)2UPLBEC1059

to the pressure of the State employees and for the first time in the year 1988, took a policy decision that of the Rules of 1976 deals with the recruitment to class IV posts in the establishment of this Court. A perusal

Class Iv Employees Association, High Court of Judicature and anr. Vs. ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2009(3)AWC2888

establishment of the High Court. The aforesaid Committee submitted its report on 23.12.2004 and gave its recommendation of the pay-scales of 750-940 and the salary of Rs. 1,000-1,750 to all such Class IV employees who are presently in the pay scale of

Railway First Class Season Ticket Passengers Association Vs. Union of ...

Court: Kerala

ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 : COPY OF FIRST CLASS SEASON TICKET ISSUED IN FAVOURT OF 1ST PETITIONER FOR as a disposal of a representation, refusing to issue first class season tickets for Super Fast trains in particular and informing

Indian Rly. Class Ii Officers Feedn. and anr. Vs. Anil Kumar Sanghi an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC3314; 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)869; 95(2003)CLT312(SC); [2003(96)FLR359]; JT2002(7)SC325; 2002LabIC3266; 2002(7)SCALE3; (2002)8SCC98; [2002]SUPP2SCR529; 2002(4)SCT453(SC)

NOTE: If the quota of 40 per cent reserved for Class II officers for promotion to Class I is not fully

Backward Class Employees Welfare Association of I.i.T. (M) Represented ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2009)5MLJ247

Sangh suffered from two serious, though not incurable, defects. The first defect was that of non-joinder of necessary parties. The only of the State and inside each department, in many different classes. For each such class there are separate rules fixing the

Brilliant Classes Vs. Saroj Rawat

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

that the daughter of the complainant/respondent had joined the coaching classes for two years as stated by the Respondent/Complainant for which

Medical Officer, Class - Ii Vs. State of Gujarat and 4 ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2009)3GLR2104

by any University or institution in India is included in First Schedule and shall be recognized as Medical qualification for the submitted that petitioner has been working as a Medical Officer, Class-II in Health and Family Welfare Department of the State of

Punjab Backward Classes Land Development and Finance Corporation Vs. P ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2000)124PLR554

hypothecate the tractor in favour of the plaintiff bank as first charge as security for the due repayment of the indebtedness of a scheme introduced for the uplift of the backward classes that Gurbax Singh was introduced to the plaintiff-bank for granting