Public Prosecutor - Judgment Search Results
The Public Prosecutor Vs. Mahadi Thirupathi Reddy and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-04-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC3128; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)564; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)287; 2002CriLJ4119; 2002(4)Crimes181(SC); JT2002(6)SC444; 2002(6)SCALE196; (2002)7SCC36
Matched in: Parties The Public Prosecutor Vs. Mahadi Thirupathi Reddy and ors.
Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Mytheswar Gangadhar and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-13-2002
Reported in: 2003(10)SCALE52
Matched in: Parties Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Mytheswar Gangadhar and anr.
Public Prosecutor, Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Boya Jaggapuram Ve ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-06-1980
Reported in: AIR1980SC1876; 1980CriLJ1301; 1980Supp(1)SCC480; 1980(Supp)SCC480
Matched in: Parties Public Prosecutor, Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Boya Jaggapuram Venkateswarlu and ors
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Public Prosecutor, Madras Vs. R. Raju and anr., Etc.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-08-1972
Reported in: AIR1972SC2504; 1972CriLJ1699; 1973LC17(SC); 1978(2)ELT410(SC); (1972)2SCC410; [1973]1SCR812; 1973(5)LC280(SC)
Matched in: Parties Public Prosecutor, Madras Vs. R. Raju and anr., Etc.
Jishnu vs Public Prosecutor
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-22-2023
VALAPPAD VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680567 BY ADV D.VIMAL DEV RESPONDENTS: STATE/THE 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS: 1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 JITHIN AGED 30 YEARS S/O. SUGATHAN, THOPPIL HOUSE, VALAPPAD … PUDUVIGHAL HOUSE, CHAVAKKAD THALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT., PIN - 680566 BY ADV SYAM N.B. OTHER PRESENT: SMT. SREEJA. V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED
Jithin vs Public Prosecutor
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-09-2023
VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680569 BY ADVS. V.S.MANSOOR SYAM N.B. RESPONDENTS/STATE & RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 :-1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI, PIN - 682031 2 … SYAM N.B. RESPONDENTS/STATE & RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 :-1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI, PIN - 682031 2 SHREEJITH, AGED 24 YEARS S/O. RANJITH, KAREPARAMBIL HOUSE, SEETHIVALAVU,
State Through Public Prosecutor, High Court of Bombay at Panaji Vs. An ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-08-2008
Reported in: 2009CriLJ1355
proved and, therefore, proceeded to acquit them. Aggrieved thereby the State has preferred this appeal.6. We have heard Public Prosecutor Ms Winnie Coutinho for the State, Advocate P. P. Singh for the respondent Nos. 1 and 4, Advocate … Upadhye. He however, held that complicity of the respondents in the said dacoity was not proved. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the learned Assistant Session Judge was in error in not believing the evidence of P.W.1, Kunda
Public Prosecutor Vs. Molli Venkateswara Viswaswara Kumar,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2008
Reported in: 2008(1)ALD(Cri)565; 2008(2)ALT(Cri)111; 2008CriLJ1997
dated 19.11.2006, the trial Court acquitted the respondents-A1 to A3 herein. Hence, this appeal by the State.2. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that though the eye witnesses turned hostile, there is sufficient circumstantial evidence in the form of medical … established and the trial Court had acquitted the accused, by taking hyper technical view of the matter.3. Learned Public Prosecutor further submits that even if it is a fact that Al received injuries in the altercation, the mere
Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Radhakrishna Nagesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2009
Reported in: 2009CriLJ1870
Sections 363 and 376(2)(f) of I.P.C. and was acquitted thereof under Section 235(1), Cr.P.C.2. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the appellant-State and the learned Counsel for the respondent-accused. Perused the records.3. The case of the prosecution … him thereof giving benefit of doubt. Aggrieved by the same, the State preferred the present appeal.7. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the appellant-State would contend that the trial Court acquitted the accused on flimsy and-trivial grounds ignoring
Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. ChollangIn Arjuna Rao and an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-28-2007
Reported in: 2007CriLJ2690
and acquitted them accordingly, by judgment dated 26-8-2003. Hence, this criminal appeal by the State.7. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the appellant-State and learned Counsel appearing for the respondents A-l and A-2.8. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor … Public Prosecutor appearing for the appellant-State and learned Counsel appearing for the respondents A-l and A-2.8. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that PW-1 is the victim and her testimony is cogent and consistent and therefore, the trial Court
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free