Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Public Prosecutor - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 04 2002

The Public Prosecutor Vs. Mahadi Thirupathi Reddy and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-04-2002

Reported in: AIR2002SC3128; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)564; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)287; 2002CriLJ4119; 2002(4)Crimes181(SC); JT2002(6)SC444; 2002(6)SCALE196; (2002)7SCC36

Matched in: Parties The Public Prosecutor Vs. Mahadi Thirupathi Reddy and ors.


Nov 13 2002

Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Mytheswar Gangadhar and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-13-2002

Reported in: 2003(10)SCALE52

Matched in: Parties Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Mytheswar Gangadhar and anr.


Oct 06 1980

Public Prosecutor, Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Boya Jaggapuram Ve ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-06-1980

Reported in: AIR1980SC1876; 1980CriLJ1301; 1980Supp(1)SCC480; 1980(Supp)SCC480

Matched in: Parties Public Prosecutor, Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Boya Jaggapuram Venkateswarlu and ors


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 08 1972

Public Prosecutor, Madras Vs. R. Raju and anr., Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-08-1972

Reported in: AIR1972SC2504; 1972CriLJ1699; 1973LC17(SC); 1978(2)ELT410(SC); (1972)2SCC410; [1973]1SCR812; 1973(5)LC280(SC)

Matched in: Parties Public Prosecutor, Madras Vs. R. Raju and anr., Etc.


Feb 22 2023

Jishnu vs Public Prosecutor

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-22-2023

VALAPPAD VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680567 BY ADV D.VIMAL DEV RESPONDENTS: STATE/THE 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS: 1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 JITHIN AGED 30 YEARS S/O. SUGATHAN, THOPPIL HOUSE, VALAPPAD … PUDUVIGHAL HOUSE, CHAVAKKAD THALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT., PIN - 680566 BY ADV SYAM N.B. OTHER PRESENT: SMT. SREEJA. V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED


Jun 09 2023

Jithin vs Public Prosecutor

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jun-09-2023

VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680569 BY ADVS. V.S.MANSOOR SYAM N.B. RESPONDENTS/STATE & RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 :-1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI, PIN - 682031 2 … SYAM N.B. RESPONDENTS/STATE & RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 :-1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI, PIN - 682031 2 SHREEJITH, AGED 24 YEARS S/O. RANJITH, KAREPARAMBIL HOUSE, SEETHIVALAVU,


Aug 08 2008

State Through Public Prosecutor, High Court of Bombay at Panaji Vs. An ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-08-2008

Reported in: 2009CriLJ1355

proved and, therefore, proceeded to acquit them. Aggrieved thereby the State has preferred this appeal.6. We have heard Public Prosecutor Ms Winnie Coutinho for the State, Advocate P. P. Singh for the respondent Nos. 1 and 4, Advocate … Upadhye. He however, held that complicity of the respondents in the said dacoity was not proved. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the learned Assistant Session Judge was in error in not believing the evidence of P.W.1, Kunda


Jan 17 2008

Public Prosecutor Vs. Molli Venkateswara Viswaswara Kumar,

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-17-2008

Reported in: 2008(1)ALD(Cri)565; 2008(2)ALT(Cri)111; 2008CriLJ1997

dated 19.11.2006, the trial Court acquitted the respondents-A1 to A3 herein. Hence, this appeal by the State.2. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that though the eye witnesses turned hostile, there is sufficient circumstantial evidence in the form of medical … established and the trial Court had acquitted the accused, by taking hyper technical view of the matter.3. Learned Public Prosecutor further submits that even if it is a fact that Al received injuries in the altercation, the mere


Jan 23 2009

Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Radhakrishna Nagesh

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-23-2009

Reported in: 2009CriLJ1870

Sections 363 and 376(2)(f) of I.P.C. and was acquitted thereof under Section 235(1), Cr.P.C.2. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the appellant-State and the learned Counsel for the respondent-accused. Perused the records.3. The case of the prosecution … him thereof giving benefit of doubt. Aggrieved by the same, the State preferred the present appeal.7. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the appellant-State would contend that the trial Court acquitted the accused on flimsy and-trivial grounds ignoring


Feb 28 2007

Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. ChollangIn Arjuna Rao and an ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-28-2007

Reported in: 2007CriLJ2690

and acquitted them accordingly, by judgment dated 26-8-2003. Hence, this criminal appeal by the State.7. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the appellant-State and learned Counsel appearing for the respondents A-l and A-2.8. Learned Additional Public ProsecutorPublic Prosecutor appearing for the appellant-State and learned Counsel appearing for the respondents A-l and A-2.8. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that PW-1 is the victim and her testimony is cogent and consistent and therefore, the trial Court


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial