First Information Report - Judgment Search Results

i) the Impugned Fir No.28/2010 Dt.29/1/2010 (Annexure P3) Is Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of her sister and appears to have lodged a false FIR against petitioner No.1 maliciously and vexatiously, in order to wreak complainant, a criminal case was registered against petitioner No.1, vide FIR, bearing No.28 dated 29.1.2010 (Annexure P3), on accusation of having Singh Sullar) Judge 23.11.2012 AS Whether to be referred to reporter ?. Yes/No

Abhijit Kallianpur (Shown as Abhijit in the FIR) Vs. State of Karnatak ...

Court: Karnataka

- accused Nos.4 to 8 and produced them before the first respondent along with the panchanama. 3. On the basis of on 3.2.2017, at about 7.00 p.m., the informant received credible information about prostitution being carried on at Shivai Thai Spa at case of GOENKA SAJAN KUMAR vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH reported in 2015(3) Crimes 281 (A.P.) on these points. 6. I

Subodh Kumar Dhar Ray and ors. Vs. State on First Information Report o ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1966CriLJ323

proper way to approach a case of this kind is, first, to marshal the evidence against the accused excluding the confession the house of Subodh and requested him to divulge the information of Bimal. At that time too he did not give mother and it had some bloodstains. From the Chemical Examiner's report it appears that all these exhibits bore marks of human

“petitioner-husband Is Praying for Grant of Anticipatory Bail in Cas ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

demand of dowry in India. The allegations contained in the first complaint were found to be false by the police, vide be still resident of England and has filed the present FIR through her father. It is submitted that the petitioner is found to be false by the police, by means of report (Annexure P4), in that eventuality, the complainant appears to have

Hanumandas Vallabhdas and Son, a Partnership Fir, Its Partner, Shri Sh ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(3)ALLMR295; 2007(3)BomCR680; 2007(4)MhLj721

Court. The Petitioner, thereafter, also is pursuing the said dismissed first appeal stamp No. 16674 of 2001, in this Court. Thus, on 29th June, 1975. By this public notice, it was informed to the public at large that the land given under S/o Maluram Agrawal v. Kaladevi Wd/o Sawarmal Agrawal and Anr. reported in 2007 (2) Mh.L.J. 60. In this case, the learned

Petitioner Bhupinder Gupta Is Arrayed as an Accused in Fir Vs. State o ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

were thus, dropped and are no more part of the FIR. It was only after such result of the investigations that Parsoon, J.Petitioner Bhupinder Gupta is arrayed as an accused in FIR No.552 dated 28.10.2013 under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC Bhushan Parsoon) Judge March 11, 2014 'Yag Dutt' 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2.

This Is a Petition for Quashing of Fir No. 226 Dated 28.7.2012 Vs. Sta ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

28.7.2012 u/s 406/420/120-B IPC registered at P.S.Tripuri, Patiala. The said FIR was registered at the instance of respondent No.2. Counsel for the main accused, for the last 20 yeaRs.It has been informed that challan has already been presented. Without considering the documents, already been presented. Without considering the documents, forming part of report u/s 173 (2) Cr.P.C.it will not be feasible for this

“learned Counsel for the Petitioner Has Submitted That in the Fir Na ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

offence under Section 307 IPC has been added in the FIR. Learned counsel has further contended that the petitioner is student case registered against them along with their other co-accused, vide FIR No.6 dated 10.01.2013, on accusation of having committed the offences Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the FIR, name of the petitioner appeared and it is mentioned that

The Aforementioned Fir Was Registered Against Vs. Karuna Bhardwaj …. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Cr.P.C.is for grant of pre-arrest bail to her in case FIR No.178 dated 5.8.2013 under Sections 420/465/467/468/471/120-B IPC registered at Police from the trial Court where they were facing trial in FIR No.3 dated 13.2.2012 under Sections 420/406/448/465/467/468/471/474 and 120-B IPC registered Cr.P.C.is for grant of pre-arrest bail to her in case FIR No.178 dated 5.8.2013 under Sections 420/465/467/468/471/120-B IPC registered at Police

The Aforementioned Fir Was Registered on the Vs. Harpinder Singh @ Lal ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

they were earlier required in a case arising out of FIR No.108 dated 6.10.2013 for the offences punishable under Section 120-B, at Sultanpur byepass, Kapurthala alongwith fellow officials where a secret informer came and told him that the three petitioners had formed 120-B IPC registered at Police Station City, Kapurthala. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a ruqa sent by