First Information Report - Judgment Search Results
P.a. Jinas (Wrongly Shown as P.a. Ginas in the FIR), vs State of Keral ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-13-2024
within the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matterand, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioners even while the petitioners is on bail as laid down by the … 2024 CRIME NO.12/2024 OF Kadavanthra Police Station, Ernakulam PETITIONER/S:1 P.A. JINAS (WRONGLY SHOWN AS P.A. GINAS IN THE FIR), AGED 53 YEARS,S/O. LATE ABDUL RAHIMAN, GALAXY HOUSE, SIUP SCHOOL LANE, DESHABHIMANI ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI, PIN - 2 … Station, Ernakulam PETITIONER/S:1 P.A. JINAS (WRONGLY SHOWN AS P.A. GINAS IN THE FIR), AGED 53 YEARS,S/O. LATE ABDUL RAHIMAN, GALAXY HOUSE, SIUP SCHOOL LANE, DESHABHIMANI
Muhammed Shahirsha V.P (Shaheer in the FIR) vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-16-2023
THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1944 PETITIONERS/Accused:1 MUHAMMED SHAHIRSHA V.P (SHAHEER IN THE FIR) AGED 22 YEARS S/O ABDUL RASHEED V.P, VAYAPPURATH HOUSE, PARAMBATHKAVU, KODUVALLY P.O, KOZHIKODE DIST, PIN - 673572. 2 … THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1944 PETITIONERS/Accused:1 MUHAMMED SHAHIRSHA V.P (SHAHEER IN THE FIR) AGED 22 YEARS S/O ABDUL RASHEED V.P, VAYAPPURATH HOUSE, PARAMBATHKAVU, KODUVALLY P.O, KOZHIKODE DIST, PIN - 673572. 2 … 2023 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1944 PETITIONERS/Accused:1 MUHAMMED SHAHIRSHA V.P (SHAHEER IN THE FIR) AGED 22 YEARS S/O ABDUL RASHEED V.P, VAYAPPURATH HOUSE, PARAMBATHKAVU, KODUVALLY P.O,
1. Bhuvaneswaran ( Wrongly Written as Bhuvanen in FIR), vs State of Ke ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-09-2023
directed to appear before the investigating officer on all Mondays till final report is filed.6. Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that,the bail is … 2023 CRIME NO.473/2023 OF THALAYOLAPARAMBU POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3:1 BHUVANESWARAN (WRONGLY WRITTEN AS BHUVANEN IN FIR), AGED 55 YEARS S/O. KUMARAN ( WRONGLY WRITTEN AS BHUVANAN IN FIR), KAZHUTHUVEETIL HOUSE, THURUTHUMEKARAYIL, K. S MANGALAM … 2023 CRIME NO.473/2023 OF THALAYOLAPARAMBU POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3:1 BHUVANESWARAN (WRONGLY WRITTEN AS BHUVANEN IN FIR), AGED 55 YEARS S/O. KUMARAN ( WRONGLY WRITTEN AS BHUVANAN IN FIR), KAZHUTHUVEETIL HOUSE, THURUTHUMEKARAYIL, K. S MANGALAM
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mohammed Gafoor Also Known as Abdul Gafoor (Mentioned in the Complaint ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-04-2023
APPL. NO. 4682 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: MOHAMMED GAFOOR ALSO KNOWN AS ABDUL GAFOOR (MENTIONED IN THE COMPLAINT & FIR AS ABDUL GAFOOR) , AGED 40 YEARS S/O ABDUL RAHMAN, RESISDING AT AZHIKKULANGARA HOUSE, MANNARA PARAMBU,KAPPUR (P.O) PALAKKAD … APPL. NO. 4682 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: MOHAMMED GAFOOR ALSO KNOWN AS ABDUL GAFOOR (MENTIONED IN THE COMPLAINT & FIR AS ABDUL GAFOOR) , AGED 40 YEARS S/O ABDUL RAHMAN, RESISDING AT AZHIKKULANGARA HOUSE, MANNARA PARAMBU,KAPPUR (P.O) PALAKKAD … his arrest was recorded, and he was released on bail. It is reported that the petitioner is cooperating with the investigation. Thus, it is evident
Prathyaksh, (Wrongly Shown as Prathyush in Anx. a FIR) S/O. Shyju vs S ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-18-2023
to previous enimity, the petitioner and the other accused voluntarily caused grievous injuries to the defacto complainant. The first accused cut at the back of his head and other parts of his body. The petitioner fisted the … 11 A.M. for a period of four months or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier.(c) The petitioner shall not try to influence … 2023 F.I.R. NO.509/2023 OF ANCHUTHENGU POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED: PRATHYAKSH, (WRONGLY SHOWN AS PRATHYUSH IN ANX. A FIR) S/O. SHYJU, AGED 21 YEARS MEDAYIL KRISHNA, MAMPALLY, ANCHUTHENGU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 309. (THE ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER IS WRONGLY
Hanumandas Vallabhdas and Son, a Partnership Fir, Its Partner, Shri Sh ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-16-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)ALLMR295; 2007(3)BomCR680; 2007(4)MhLj721
3, 6 and 7 despite service.2. Challenge, in this writ petition, is to the order passed by the first Appellate Court below Exhibit-53 on 26th August, 2005, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 171 of 2001, pending on … plaintiff Pitambar Bhatu had issued a public notice on 29th June, 1975. By this public notice, it was informed to the public at large that the land given under the settlement deed to Baijabai, was given with … Hari Shankar Singhania and Ors. v. Dr. Gaur Hari Singhania and Ors. reported in 2003 (1) ALL MR 548. In the matter of Hari (supra)
i) the Impugned Fir No.28/2010 Dt.29/1/2010 (Annexure P3) Is Vs. State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
and in the wake of complaint of the complainant, a criminal case was registered against petitioner No.1, vide FIR, bearing No.28 dated 29.1.2010 (Annexure P3), on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under Sections 363 & … and in the wake of complaint of the complainant, a criminal case was registered against petitioner No.1, vide FIR, bearing No.28 dated 29.1.2010 (Annexure P3), on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under Sections 363 & … accordingly. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge 23.11.2012 AS Whether to be referred to reporter ?. Yes/No
M/S. Kamakshi Builders,a Partnership Fir Vs. Dr.Ambedkar Educational S ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
to identity of the plaint schedule property was raised by respondent at any time previously in the Suit, First appeal or in the Civil Appeal; that the executing court cannot go behind the decree; that the application … the rent with all arrears to the petitioner. The petitioner also issued a notice on 13.10.1988 to respondent informing about the transfer of title to it. In the same letter, petitioner determined the lease of respondent on … it observing that the decree was not executable because of some contradictory reports of a local Commissioner. The judgment in favour of the plaintiff was
“as Per the Allegations in the Fir on 21.09.2013 when a Vs. State of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
SINGH DHINDSA, J. (ORAL).This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.352 dated 22.09.2013 under Sections 306/406/34 IPC (now added sections 304 & 386 IPC by deleting sections 306/506 … SINGH DHINDSA, J. (ORAL).This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.352 dated 22.09.2013 under Sections 306/406/34 IPC (now added sections 304 & 386 IPC by deleting sections 306/506 … been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.352 dated 22.09.2013 under Sections 306/406/34 IPC (now added sections 304 &
Petitioner Bhupinder Gupta Is Arrayed as an Accused in Fir Vs. State o ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-11-2014
Sandhu, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.Petitioner Bhupinder Gupta is arrayed as an accused in FIR No.552 dated 28.10.2013 under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC registered at Police Station, Sector-5, Panchkula wherein Sections … Sandhu, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.Petitioner Bhupinder Gupta is arrayed as an accused in FIR No.552 dated 28.10.2013 under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC registered at Police Station, Sector-5, Panchkula wherein Sections … (Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon) Judge March 11, 2014 'Yag Dutt' 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. Whether to
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free