Krishnaraj vs Excise Inspector

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 05, 2023

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1362489

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1362489
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice V.G.Arun
Decided On: Jun 05, 2023
Case Number: Crl.Rev.Pet/574/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnaraj

Respondent

Excise Inspector

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice v.g.arun monday, the 5th day of june 2023 / 15th jyaishta, 1945 against the order/judgment in crmp 2588/2023 of judicial magistrate of first class , kodungallur revision petitioner/s: krishnaraj aged 36 years s/o rai.an, panikkassery house, valappad village and desom,chavakkad thaluk,trichur, pin - 680567 by advs. t.m.chandran s.sujith respondent/s: 1 excise inspector vadanappilly, vadanappilly p.o., trichur, pin - 680614 2 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala,ernakulam, pin - 682031 other present: sr.pp.renjith george this criminal revision petition having come up for admission on 05.06.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:orderdated this the 5th day of june, 2023 the challenge in this revision petition is against an order requiring the petitioner to furnish cash security of rs.4,10,000/- for releasing of his vehicle seized in connection with a crime registered under the abkari act. although learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the condition is onerous and the petitioner should be permitted to furnish bond instead of cash security, since he is not an accused. the order being in terms of section 53b of the abkari act, i find no reason to interfere. the revision petition is hence dismissed. sd/- v.g arun judge sj

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMP 2588/2023 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS , KODUNGALLUR REVISION PETITIONER/S: KRISHNARAJ AGED 36 YEARS S/O RAI.AN, PANIKKASSERY HOUSE, VALAPPAD VILLAGE AND DESOM,CHAVAKKAD THALUK,TRICHUR, PIN - 680567 BY ADVS. T.M.CHANDRAN S.SUJITH RESPONDENT/S: 1 EXCISE INSPECTOR VADANAPPILLY, VADANAPPILLY P.O., TRICHUR, PIN - 680614 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 OTHER PRESENT: SR.PP.RENJITH GEORGE THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 5th day of June, 2023 The challenge in this revision petition is against an order requiring the petitioner to furnish cash security of Rs.4,10,000/- for releasing of his vehicle seized in connection with a crime registered under the Abkari Act. Although learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the condition is onerous and the petitioner should be permitted to furnish bond instead of cash security, since he is not an accused. The order being in terms of Section 53B of the Abkari Act, I find no reason to interfere. The revision petition is hence dismissed. Sd/- V.G ARUN JUDGE SJ

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2023 Same Parties Krishnaraj vs Excise Inspector Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice V.G.Arun

In connection with Public prosecutor First class high court H Res