Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

SteIn Vs. Luken

Stein vs Luken

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-02-1970
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102654

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
396 U.S. 555
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Stein

Respondent

Luken

Excerpt

stein v. luken - 396 u.s. 555 (1970) u.s. supreme court stein v. luken, 396 u.s. 555 (1970) 396 u.s. 555 stein v. luken et al. appeal from the supreme court of illinois no. 854. decided february 2, 1970 appeal dismissed. yale stein, appellant, pro se. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for failure to docket the case within the time prescribed by rule 13. providence & worcester co. v. united states, 396 u.s. 555 (1970) 396 u.s. 555 (1970) "> u.s. supreme court providence & worcester co. v. united states, 396 u.s. 555 (1970) 396 u.s. 555 providence & worcester co. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york no. 919. decided february 2, 1970 300 f. supp. 185, affirmed. harold i. meyerson for appellant. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general mclaren, deputy solicitor general springer, howard e. shapiro, robert w. ginnane, and leonard s. goodman for appellees the united states et al. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 396 u.s. 555, 556

Full Judgment

STEIN v. LUKEN - 396 U.S. 555 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court STEIN v. LUKEN, 396 U.S. 555 (1970) 396 U.S. 555

STEIN v. LUKEN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
No. 854.
Decided February 2, 1970

Appeal dismissed.

Yale Stein, appellant, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for failure to docket the case within the time prescribed by Rule 13.


PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/102654"> 396 U.S. 555 </a> (1970) 396 U.S. 555 (1970) "> U.S. Supreme Court PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 555 (1970) 396 U.S. 555

PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK No. 919.
Decided February 2, 1970

300 F. Supp. 185, affirmed.

Harold I. Meyerson for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Deputy Solicitor General Springer, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Leonard S. Goodman for appellees the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 396 U.S. 555, 556



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial