Skip to content


Et Al - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: et al Page 1 of about 255 results (0.021 seconds)
May 24 1957 (SC)

Al. Pr. Ranganathan Chettiar Vs. Al. Pr. Al. Periakaruppan Chettiar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1957SC815; (1958)IMLJ36(SC); [1958]1SCR214

right and powers of alienation such as gift, exchange, sale, etc. The first defendant has the right also to alienate the affect Periakaruppa. It is in evidence that after this compromise Alagappa and his family consisting of his wife and son cleared

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 1979 (FN)

Friedman Et Al. Vs. Rogers Et Al.

Court: US Supreme Court

membership in TOA because of noncompliance with the code of ethics required for membership, brought an action challenging the constitutionality of v. Rogers et al., 440 U.S. 1 (1979) Friedman et al. v. Rogers et al. No. 77-1163 Argued November 8, 1978

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 04 2013 (HC)

Al Ashraf Kably and Another Vs. Al Farrok Kably and Another

Court: Mumbai

district. 6. The applicability of the Family Court's Act as also the CrPC u/s.1 of the Family Court's Act as also

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 15 1936 (PC)

Al. St. an. Chidambaram Chettiar Vs. Al. Vr. P. Pethaperumal Chettiar ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1937Mad163; (1937)1MLJ605

appointed receiver for the special purpose of at once realising all the debts due to the devasthanam from the members of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 06 1938 (PC)

Ct. Al. Vr. Alagappa Chettiar and anr. Vs. the Bank of Chettinad, Ltd. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1939Mad6; (1938)2MLJ944

to the effect that after he received the day book, etc., copies at Penang he would send the same 'to you a money-lending business in Mandalay with the vilasam of CT. AL. VR. and for the conduct thereof appointed one Somasundara, agent.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 1915 (PC)

A.L.A.R. Rm. Arunachallam Chettiar (Through His Authorized Agent M. Su ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1917)ILR40Mad640

the ground that it was not used for agricultural purposes. All that was there held was that it was not necessary

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 26 2011 (FN)

Ashcroft Vs. Al-kidd

Court: US Supreme Court

a motion to dismiss, we accept as true the factual allegations in Abdullah al-Kidds complaint. The complaint alleges that, in the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 13 2008 (HC)

Al-qahtani Pipe Coating Terminal Vs. Minerals Sales (P.) Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2008]34SCL89(Bom)

Oil Producing Companies in the world, such as ARAMCO, Shell, etc., Otoklin had represented that it wished to enter the field It is stated that the respondent No. 1 Official Liquidator alone is responsible and liable for the harm and loss and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 12 1999 (FN)

El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. Vs. Tsui Yuan Tseng

Court: US Supreme Court

en responsabilite, it quelque titre que ce soit, ne peut etre exercee que dans les conditions et limites prevues par la if not allowed under the Convention, is not available at all. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled otherwise.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 07 1994 (HC)

Al-AmIn Seatrans Ltd. Vs. Owners and Party Interested in Vessel M.V. ' ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1995Cal169,(1995)1CALLT98(HC)

M.V. Loyal Bird of Loyal Shipping Pvt. Ltd. To take all actions necessary in this respect and to arrest M.V. Loyal

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //