Et Al - Judgment Search Results

Al. Pr. Ranganathan Chettiar Vs. Al. Pr. Al. Periakaruppan Chettiar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1957SC815; (1958)IMLJ36(SC); [1958]1SCR214

who, at the time, were having large banking transactions in Burma and other places in South-East Asia. One AL. PR. Periakaruppan Chettiar (hereinafter referred to as Periakaruppa) owned and possessed considerable properties. He adopted one AL. PR. … and my wife shall conduct the aforesaid Tirupani. The daily expenses of the Samadhi aforesaid and Guru pooja etc., shall be met from the Patasala charity funds and conducted. (15) Apart from the properties which have been

Al Ashraf Kably and Another Vs. Al Farrok Kably and Another

Court: Mumbai

the first class may, upon proof of such neglect or refusal, order such person to make a monthly allowance for the maintenance of his wife or such child, father or mother, at such monthly rate, as such

M/S Al Naureen Exports vs M/S Al Noor Exports & Ors.

Court: Delhi

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 20th January, 2026 + ARB.P. 1781/2025 M/S AL NAUREEN EXPORTS .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sanya Kumar, Mr. Harsh Jain and Mr. S. Abinaya, Advs. M: 9818335779 Email:

Al. St. an. Chidambaram Chettiar Vs. Al. Vr. P. Pethaperumal Chettiar ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1937Mad163; (1937)1MLJ605

in particular by way of an injunction and for an account. The suit was decreed. The right of all the members of the A.L. and V.R. families to the trusteeship, as also the validity of the 1907

Friedman Et Al. Vs. Rogers Et Al.

Court: US Supreme Court

Friedman et al. v. Rogers et al. - 440 U.S. 1 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Friedman et al. v. Rogers et … Friedman et al. v. Rogers et al. - 440 U.S. 1 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Friedman et al. v. Rogers et al., 440 U.S. 1

Ct. Al. Vr. Alagappa Chettiar and anr. Vs. the Bank of Chettinad, Ltd. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1939Mad6; (1938)2MLJ944

favour of the plaintiff on 4th May, 1932. The first defendant is the eldest son of one CT. AL. VR. Veerappa Chettiar who died in October, 1927. The fifth and sixth defendants are the minor sons of … that had been made by the first defendant to the effect that after he received the day book, etc., copies at Penang he would send the same 'to you after perusal.' We see nothing to justify the

A.L.A.R. Rm. Arunachallam Chettiar (Through His Authorized Agent M. Su ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1917)ILR40Mad640

be levied after the Estates Land Act came into force, as it was a charge for supervision not allowed by the Act which removes all restraints on harvesting by the tenant on the part of the landholder.

L. Narayanan Chettiar, Al. Pertanan Shanmugham Vs. R.M. Loganathan and ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1998)1MLJ27

the same. By registered partition deed dated 24.8.1939 among the petitioner's father Lakshmanan Chettiar and his two sons Alagusundaram Chettiar and minor petitioner represented by his father as guardian, all the properties except the petitionermentioned property were

Mohideen Bee Et Al Vs. Syed Meer Saheb Et Al

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1916Mad1122; (1915)ILR38Mad1099

heirs of one Syed Oomer Sahib who died about nineteen years ago leaving three sons and three daughters all of whom attained their majority considerably more than three years before this suit. Syed Oomer had a brother

Leavitt, Governor of Utah, Et Al. Vs. Jane L. Et Al

Court: US Supreme Court

LEAVITT, GOVERNOR OF UTAH, ET AL. v. JANE L. ET AL - 518 U.S. 137 (1996) OCTOBER TERM, 1995 Per Curiam LEAVITT, GOVERNOR OF … LEAVITT, GOVERNOR OF UTAH, ET AL. v. JANE L. ET AL - 518 U.S. 137 (1996) OCTOBER TERM, 1995 Per Curiam LEAVITT, GOVERNOR OF UTAH, ET AL. v. JANE