No Par - Judgment Search Results

Haw Par Bros. International Ltd. and ors. Vs. Rangoon Chemical Works a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Matched in: Parties Haw Par Bros. International Ltd. and ors. Vs. Rangoon Chemical Works and Ltd. and ors.

Reza Daru Pars Company & Ors vs.nani Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd & Anr

Court: Delhi

$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 194/2016 REZA DARU PARS COMPANY & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Hare Ram Tiwary, Advs. Versus NANI

Yamuna Par Hawkers Association vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors ...

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6927/2026 & CM APPL. 33926/2026, CM APPL. YAMUNA PAR HAWKERS ASSOCIATION .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mrigna Shekhar, Ms. Manisha Mehta, Mr. Prateek Seth and Ms. Kriti Singh Advs.versusMUNICIPAL

Chandran vs Parli Grama Panchayath

Court: Kerala

TALUK. BY ADVS. SAIJO HASSAN SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN SRI.RAFEEK. V.K. SRI.U.M.HASSAN SMT.J.KASTHURI SMT.P.PARVATHY SMT.SURYA P SHAJI RESPONDENTS: 1 PARLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY IT SECRETARY, PARLI 2 THE SECRETARY, PARLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PARLI 3 USHA, AGED 40

Brahmaputra Par Ii Mach Mahal Samabai Samity Ltd. Vs. State of Assam a ...

Court: Guwahati

Poha and Matshya Babasayee Samabai Samity Ltd. Bhitorkakila, P.O. Nimatighat. 3. The matter relates to settlement of Brahmaputra Part -- II Fishery of Sibsagar District (hereinafter referred to as the Fisherry) under proviso to Rule 12 of

Seven Hills Par Boiled Rice Mill Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (2008)11VST184(AP)

a dealer is taxable at different rates, the aforesaid formula shall be applied separately in respect of each part of the turnover liable to a different rate of tax.Section 15. Restrictions and conditions in regard to tax

Aayush Par Overseas Vs. the Chief Manager, Uco Bank and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: IV(2006)BC193; RLW2006(2)Raj1573; 2006(2)WLC660

to pay the secured debt.15. And after referring Section 13(4), learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in para 18 of the writ petition the petitioner has specifically mentioned that their account has wrongly been declared as

Par Mohan Das S/O Sri Tarai Das Vs. the Vice-chancellor,

Court: Patna

Principal without any option to the petitioner and without any application or request made by him for that particular post. It is obvious that his posting was made as per the discretion exercised by the Principal. Therefore,

Kaka Ram Pars Ram and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1996)112PLR691

life, which have been cherished for centuries in this land of Mahavir and Mahatma Gandhi. People from different parts of the world come here to learn these fundamental principles of life. However, post-independence era and particularly the

Pars Ram Vs. Sh. Shiv Chand and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1968P& H331

Hindu and is a Chaman by caste As such he belongs to Scheduled Castes within the meaning of paragraph 2 read with Part X of the Schedule to the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order. 1950 (to be referred