Halpert Vs. Udall

Halpert vs Udall

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-18-1965

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101251

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101251
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jan-18-1965
Case Number: 379 U.S. 645
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Halpert

Respondent

Udall

Excerpt

halpert v. udall - 379 u.s. 645 (1965) u.s. supreme court halpert v. udall, 379 u.s. 645 (1965) 379 u.s. 645 halpert et al. v. udall, secretary of the interior. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of florida. no. 552. decided january 18, 1965. 231 f. supp. 574, affirmed. leo m. alpert for appellants. solicitor general cox, roger p. marquis and herbert pittle for appellee. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. winkle v. bannan, 379 u.s. 645 (1965) 379 u.s. 645 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court winkle v. bannan, 379 u.s. 645 (1965) 379 u.s. 645 winkle v. bannan, warden. appeal from the supreme court of michigan. no. 553. decided january 18, 1965. motion to strike excerpts from motion to dismiss denied; appeal dismissed; and certiorari denied. walter a. kurz and dennis boyle for appellant. frank j. kelley, attorney general of michigan, and james r. ramsey, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to strike excerpts from the motion to dismiss is denied. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 379 u.s. 645, 646

Full Judgment

HALPERT v. UDALL - 379 U.S. 645 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court HALPERT v. UDALL, 379 U.S. 645 (1965) 379 U.S. 645

HALPERT ET AL. v. UDALL, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
FLORIDA. No. 552.
Decided January 18, 1965.

231 F. Supp. 574, affirmed.

Leo M. Alpert for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Roger P. Marquis and Herbert Pittle for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

WINKLE v. BANNAN, <a href="/101251"> 379 U.S. 645 </a> (1965) 379 U.S. 645 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court WINKLE v. BANNAN, 379 U.S. 645 (1965) 379 U.S. 645

WINKLE v. BANNAN, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 553.
Decided January 18, 1965.

Motion to strike excerpts from motion to dismiss denied; appeal dismissed; and certiorari denied.

Walter A. Kurz and Dennis Boyle for appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, and James R. Ramsey, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to strike excerpts from the motion to dismiss is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 379 U.S. 645, 646

Same Parties Halpert vs Udall Same Subject Land Acquisition