Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Winkle Vs. Bannan

Winkle vs Bannan

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-06-1961
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100014

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
368 U.S. 34
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Winkle

Respondent

Bannan

Excerpt

winkle v. bannan - 368 u.s. 34 (1961) u.s. supreme court winkle v. bannan, 368 u.s. 34 (1961) 368 u.s. 34 winkle v. bannan, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of michigan. no. 93, misc. decided november 6, 1961. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded. petitioner pro se. paul l. adams, attorney general of michigan, joseph b. bilitzke, solicitor general, and robert weinbaum, assistant solicitor general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and, as suggested by the attorney general of michigan, the case is remanded for consideration in light of mapp v. ohio, 367 u.s. 643 . coates v. walters, 368 u.s. 34 (1961) 368 u.s. 34 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court coates v. walters, 368 u.s. 34 (1961) 368 u.s. 34 coates v. walters. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 339, misc. decided november 6, 1961. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 9 n. y. 2d 242, 173 n. e. 2d 797. vito j. cassan for appellant. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, paxton blair, solicitor general, and jean m. coon, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 368 u.s. 34, 35

Full Judgment

WINKLE v. BANNAN - 368 U.S. 34 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court WINKLE v. BANNAN, 368 U.S. 34 (1961) 368 U.S. 34

WINKLE v. BANNAN, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 93, Misc.
Decided November 6, 1961.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Joseph B. Bilitzke, Solicitor General, and Robert Weinbaum, Assistant Solicitor General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and, as suggested by the Attorney General of Michigan, the case is remanded for consideration in light of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 .


COATES v. WALTERS, <a href="/100014"> 368 U.S. 34 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 34 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court COATES v. WALTERS, 368 U.S. 34 (1961) 368 U.S. 34

COATES v. WALTERS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 339, Misc.
Decided November 6, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 9 N. Y. 2d 242, 173 N. E. 2d 797.

Vito J. Cassan for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Jean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 368 U.S. 34, 35



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial