Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Blaikie Vs. Power

Blaikie vs Power

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-13-1964
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100998

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
375 U.S. 439
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Blaikie

Respondent

Power

Excerpt

blaikie v. power - 375 u.s. 439 (1964) u.s. supreme court blaikie v. power, 375 u.s. 439 (1964) 375 u.s. 439 blaikie v. power et al., constituting board of elections, city of new york, et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 617. decided january 13, 1964. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 13 n. y. 2d 134, 193 n. e. 2d 55. harry h. lipsig for appellant. leo a. larkin, seymour b. quel and joel l. cohen for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. pennington v. city of corpus christi, 375 u.s. 439 (1964) 375 u.s. 439 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court pennington v. city of corpus christi, 375 u.s. 439 (1964) 375 u.s. 439 pennington et al. v. city of corpus christi et al. appeal from the court of civil appeals of texas, fourth supreme judicial district. no. 621. decided january 13, 1964. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 363 s. w. 2d 502. sidney p. chandler for appellants. i. m. singer for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 375 u.s. 439, 440

Full Judgment

BLAIKIE v. POWER - 375 U.S. 439 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court BLAIKIE v. POWER, 375 U.S. 439 (1964) 375 U.S. 439

BLAIKIE v. POWER ET AL., CONSTITUTING BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CITY OF
NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 617.
Decided January 13, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 13 N. Y. 2d 134, 193 N. E. 2d 55.

Harry H. Lipsig for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Seymour B. Quel and Joel L. Cohen for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


PENNINGTON v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, <a href="/100998"> 375 U.S. 439 </a> (1964) 375 U.S. 439 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court PENNINGTON v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, 375 U.S. 439 (1964) 375 U.S. 439

PENNINGTON ET AL. v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, FOURTH SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 621.
Decided January 13, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 363 S. W. 2d 502.

Sidney P. Chandler for appellants.

I. M. Singer for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 375 U.S. 439, 440



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial