Advanced Search Results

Haridas Exports Vs. All India Float Glass Mfrs. Association and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 1(2), 2, 4, 10, 11, 12A, 12A(1), 13, 14, 15, 33, 33(1), 33(3), 35, 36A, 37, 37(1), 38 and 40; Customs Tariff Act, 1982 - Sections 9, 9A, 9B and 9C; Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1995; Anti-Dumping Duty Rules, 1995 - Rules 2, 5(1), 5(4) and 14; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Sherman Act; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; Banking Regulation Act, 1949; State Bank of India Act, 1955; State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959; Insurance Act, 1938; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 2A to 5; Import Control Act; Webb Powerence Act

Reported in : AIR2002SC2728; [2002]111CompCas617(SC); II(2002)CPJ11(SC); 99(2002)DLT76(SC); 2002(82)ECC683; 2002LC14(SC); 2002(145)ELT241(SC); JT2002(5)SC253; 2002(5)SCALE253; (2002)6SC

pursued by the complainant. 4. On 10th September, 1998, the respondent No. 1 filed a complainant before the MRTP Commission under Section 33(1)(j), (ja) and Section36A read with Section 2(o) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices

Gujrat Ambuja Cements Ltd. Vs. the Mrtp Commission and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 10, 12, 33(1) and 36B; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 19, Rule 3; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Regulations - Regulations 65 and 68

Reported in : [2006]134CompCas482(Delhi); [2006]72SCL363(Delhi)

Delhi (hereafter 'MRTP Commission') in RTPE No. 21 of 2001. By the first impugned order dated 9.1.2004 the MRTP Commission rejected an application filed by the petitioner under Section 12 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices

Ghaziabad Development Authority Vs. Ved Prakash Aggarwal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 12A, 12B, 36 and 36D

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR(SC)986; 2008(8)SCALE631; (2008)7SCC686; [2009]91SCL281(SC); AIR2008SC2561; 2008(7)SCC686; 2008(4)CivilLJ795; 2008(3)Supreme688

3rd of August, 2000 passed by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, New Delhi (in short `the MRTP Commission') in R.T.P.E. No. 82 of 1998 by which the MRTP Commission had directed the GDA to deliver

All India Tyre Dealers’ Federation Vs. Tyre Manufacturers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

tyre manufacturers before the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the same was forwarded by the Ministry to the MRTP Commission (MRTPC). Consequent upon the repeal of the MRTP Act, the matter stood transferred to the Competition Commission

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority and anr. Vs. Arvind Sonekar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 10, 13 and 36A

Reported in : AIR2008SC1983; (2008)2CompLJ466(SC); 2008(1)CTLJ395(SC); 2008(6)SCALE229; (2008)11SCC31; [2008]84SCL217(SC); 2008AIRSCW2833; AIR2008SC1983; 2008(2)Supreme36

order dated 27th of March, 2001 passed by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (in short 'the MRTP Commission') in Restrictive Trade Practices Enquiry No. 82/97 by which the MRTP Commission has directed the appellants (hereinafter

Klm Royal Dutch Airlines Vs. Director General of Investigation and Reg ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 36A, 36A(1), 36B, 36D, 48C and 55; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Carriage by Air Act, 1972

Reported in : AIR2009SC938; 2008(4)AWC4028(SC); [2008]146CompCas421(SC); IV(2008)CPJ18(SC); (2009)2MLJ1077(SC); 2008(13)SCALE514; (2009)1SCC230; [2008]88SCL153(SC):2008AIRSCW8296

Commission') are being questioned. The appellant is aggrieved by the order and direction issued against them by the MRTP Commission and also by dismissal of the miscellaneous application filed by them holding that there is no apparent

K. L. Suneja Vs. Dr. (mrs.) Manjeet Kaur Monga (d) Through Her Lr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

an alternative flat of the same size and dimension. The complainant also applied under Section 12A of the MRTP Act seeking to restrain the developer from alienating flat D-301 in Siddharth Shila Apartments; she also filed C.A.

Hindustan Lever Employees' Union Vs. Hindustan Lever Limited and other ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CompanyMRTP

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 77, 82, 226(3), 391(1), 393(1) and 394; Capital Issues Control Act, 1947 - Sections 81(1)(A); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Sale of Goods Act, 1930

Reported in : AIR1995SC470; (1995)83CompLJ30(SC); JT1994(7)SC215; 1994(4)SCALE642; 1995Supp(1)SCC499; [1994]Supp4SCR723

and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (Monopolies & Restrictive Trade Practices Act). An argument has been made that the MRTP Commission is seized of the matter and until the MRTP Commission decides, it will be proper to sanction

State Commission, Delhi Vs. Ram Singh Pathak and Others

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Subject : MRTP

costs. In the above said case, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the MRTP Commission) has been arrayed as one of the opposite parties (opposite party No. 3). 2. On coming to

In Re: Alleged Cartelization by Steel Producers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

1. Consequent upon the repeal of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (the MRTP Act), the instant case pertaining to alleged cartelization in steel industry was transferred to the Commission from the