Ryan Vs. President of the Senate

Ryan vs President of the Senate

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-14-1963

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100479

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100479
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Oct-14-1963
Case Number: 375 U.S. 7
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ryan

Respondent

President of the Senate

Excerpt

ryan v. president of the senate - 375 u.s. 7 (1963) u.s. supreme court ryan v. president of the senate, 375 u.s. 7 (1963) 375 u.s. 7 ryan v. president of the senate, u.s. congress. appeal from the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit. no. 127. decided october 14, 1963. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. appellant pro se. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general douglas and sherman l. cohn for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. williams v. city of wichita, 375 u.s. 7 (1963) 375 u.s. 7 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court williams v. city of wichita, 375 u.s. 7 (1963) 375 u.s. 7 williams v. city of wichita. appeal from the supreme court of kansas. no. 132. decided october 14, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 190 kan. 317, 374 p.2d 578. kenneth g. speir, herbert h. sizemore and eugene gressman for appellant. william m. ferguson, attorney general of kansas, and charles s. rhyne for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 375 u.s. 7, 8

Full Judgment

RYAN v. PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE - 375 U.S. 7 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court RYAN v. PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, 375 U.S. 7 (1963) 375 U.S. 7

RYAN v. PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, U.S. CONGRESS.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 127.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Sherman L. Cohn for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

WILLIAMS v. CITY OF WICHITA, <a href="/100479"> 375 U.S. 7 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 7 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court WILLIAMS v. CITY OF WICHITA, 375 U.S. 7 (1963) 375 U.S. 7

WILLIAMS v. CITY OF WICHITA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 132.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 190 Kan. 317, 374 P.2d 578.

Kenneth G. Speir, Herbert H. Sizemore and Eugene Gressman for appellant.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and Charles S. Rhyne for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 7, 8

Same Parties Ryan vs President of the Senate Same Subject MRTP