Singh V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Malice
an evil disposition or unlawful motive with an intention to cause injury and without a lawful excuse, Bhupinder Singh v. State of Haryana, AIR 1968 P&H 406 (416). Malice is not merely the doing of a wrongful act … another. In its legal sense it means a wrongful act, done intentionally without just cause or excuse, Bhagat Singh v. Emperor, AIR 1930 Lah 266. Malice has been said to mean any wrong or indirect motive but a
Misconduct
of the statute and the public purpose it seeks to serve, State of Punjab v. Ex. Constable Ram Singh, AIR 1992 SC 2188: (1992) 4 SCC 54: (1992) 3 SCR 634.The word 'misconduct' is antithesis of the
Precedent
in the conduct of their affairs, as well as a basis for orderly development of legal rules, Surinder Singh v. Hardial Singh, AIR 1985 SC (1985) 1 SCC 91: (1985) 1 SCR 1059.
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Actus curiae neminem gravabit.
the Court he should be restored to the position he would have occupied but for that mistake, Jang Singh v. Brij Lal, (1964) 2 SCR 145, (para 16); See Also CIT v. B. N. Bhattacharjee, (1979) 4 SCC … 1988 SC 2031; Mithilesh Kumari v. Prem Behari Khare, (1989) 2 SCC 95: AIR 1989 SC 1247; Johri Singh v. Subh Pal Singh, (1989) 4 SC 403: AIR 1989 SC 2073; Chinnammal v. P. Arunugham, (1990) 1 SCC
May
U.P. Large Land Holdings Tax Act, 1957 in the context cannot mean 'shall' or 'must', Raja Jagannath Baksh Singh v. State of U.P., AIR 1962 SC 1563: (1963) 1 Supp SCR 220. The word 'may' generally does not … Pradesh v. Jogendra Singh, 1963 SC 1613; State of Uttar Pradesh v. Manbodan Lal, 1957 SC 912; Kamar Singh v. Delhi Administration, 1965 SC 971; Banwari Lal v. State of Bihar, 1961 SC 849; Narayana Rao v. State
Reason to believe
of the officer. The belief must be held in good faith; it cannot merely be a pretence, Partap Singh v. Director of Enforcement, AIR 1985 SC 989: (1985) 3 SCC 72. Means that reasons should exist but the … that the belief must be that of an honest and reasonable person based on reasonable grounds, Sheo Nath Singh v. Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, AIR 1971 SC 2451: (1972) 3SCC 234: (1972) 1 SCR 175. The
Confession
not make a statement which would incriminate him unless urged by the promptings of truth and conscience, Sahib Singh v. State of Haryana, (1997) 7 SCC 231: AIR 1997 SC 3247 (3254). [Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention), Act,
Terrorism
hurt by the violence and those affected by the fear) as well as in the practitioners, Devender Pal Singh v. State NCT of Delhi, AIR 2002 SC 1661 (1665): (2002) 5 SCC 234. [Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) … prolonged psychological effect it produces or has the potential of producing on the society as a whole, Madan Singh v. State of Bihar, (2004) 4 SCC 622 (635). [Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, ss. 3(1) &
Judgment
the right, recognises the commission of the injury, or negatives the allegation of one or the other, Gurdit Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1974 SC 1791 (1794): (1974) 2 SCC 260: (1974) 3 SCR 896. In finding … to the writ petition. It does not amount to judgment under clause 12 of the Letters Patent, Karam Singh v. State of J&K, AIR 1977 J&K 29. An order for transfer of a suit made under clause 13.
Person
with fine, for in the nature of things, imprisonment of a municipal corporation is out of question, Kalu Singh v. Transport Appellate Tribunal, AIR 1970 Raj 149: (1969) ILR 19 Raj 205. Person, would mean only person himself … Anandrao v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1995 Bom 206. Person, refers to human being a self-conscious personality, Badri Singh v. State of Bihar, (1996) 1 BLJ 31. Person, shall include any company or association or body of individuals,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free