Singh V The - Judgment Search Results
Avtar Singh V. the Asstt. Collector, Kurukshetra and ors. Vs. Unknown
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-09-2014
RA No.208 of 2014 with CM No.4543-44 of 2014 in CWP No.16972 of 1995 101/2 Avtar Singh v. The Asstt. Collector, Kurukshetra and ORS.Present:- Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the applicant CM No.4543 of 2014 : This application
Dhian Singh V. the Asstt. Collector, Kurukshetra and ors. Vs. Unknown
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-09-2014
RA No.214 of 2014 with CM No.4550-51 of 2014 in CWP No.16970 of 1995 101/5 Dhian Singh v. The Asstt. Collector, Kurukshetra and ORS.Present:- Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the applicant CM No.4550 of 2014 : This application
Gurmukh Singh V. the Asstt. Collector, Kurukshetra and ors. Vs. Unknow ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-09-2014
RA No.221 of 2014 with CM No.4563-64 of 2014 in CWP No.16976 of 1995 101/11 Gurmukh Singh v. The Asstt. Collector, Kurukshetra and ORS.Present:- Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the applicant CM No.4563 of 2014 : This application
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dr. Gurmeet Singh V Ito
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-04-2003
Reported in: (2004)89TTJ(NULL)362
law and against the judicial pronouncement of Honble, Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT v. Pratap Singh Amrao Singh, etc. and CIT v. Hotel Joshi 22 TW 807 (Raj). He has contended that even otherwise
Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Karnail Singh V. Kaleran
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-29-1973
Reported in: [1974]94ITR505(P& H)
far as penalties and their exigibility is concerned we have held in the quantum appeal that Shri Karnail Singh has not been able to prove that the sum as sustained by us did not belong to him … Inspecting Assistant Commissioner levying a penalty of Rs. 50,000. It was urged before the Appellate Tribunal that, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Anwar Ali, [1970] 76 I.T.R. 696;
T. K. Roy Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax. S. Karam Singh V. Commission ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Apr-03-1978
under that substantive section could only be leviable. May be the submission was not clear to me.N. IBOTOMBI SINGH J. - (8-7-77). The three references, under section 27 of the W.T. Act, 1957, by the Income-tax, Tribunal, … showed cause but it was not accepted in its entirety by the W.T.O., who, as a result, imposed various penalties for different periods of defaults. The periods of default were found by him to be 88, 76,
Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Harbans Singh Overruled in Pritam Singh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-17-1974
Reported in: [1975]98ITR331(P& H)
Tribunal have been summarised in para. 3 of the statement of the case as under :'One Shri Udham Singh of village Reru, Distt. Jullundur, was a Jat. He died on June 18, 1960. The deceased was a … assessment was to be made under section 7 read with section 39 of the Estate Duty Act, in view of the passage of the Hindu Succession Act 1956 ?'The facts as found by the Tribunal have been
Smt. Tej Kumari Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors., Uday Mistana ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Sep-22-2000
Matched in: Parties Smt. Tej Kumari Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors., Uday Mistana Bhandar V. Cit and ors., Govind Mahto V. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors., Sardar Santosh Singh V. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.
income Tax Officer Vs. Rakesh Singh. Ito V. Prem Singh. (ita No. 8422/ ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-1996
Reported in: (1998)60TTJ(Del)674
admitted to be disposed of on merits.2. Out of four appeals filed, in the case of Shri Kamal Singh appeals have been filed both by the assessed as well by the Revenue. In the cases of Shri … the return for asst. yr. 1986-87 wherein the investment in fine silver was declared at 15.214 kgs. and valued at Rs. 61,046 and further investment of Rs. 10,000 was shown as advance.6. In the case of Shri
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free