Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Singh V The - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 09 2014

Avtar Singh V. the Asstt. Collector, Kurukshetra and ors. Vs. Unknown

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-09-2014

RA No.208 of 2014 with CM No.4543-44 of 2014 in CWP No.16972 of 1995 101/2 Avtar Singh v. The Asstt. Collector, Kurukshetra and ORS.Present:- Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the applicant CM No.4543 of 2014 : This application


May 09 2014

Dhian Singh V. the Asstt. Collector, Kurukshetra and ors. Vs. Unknown

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-09-2014

RA No.214 of 2014 with CM No.4550-51 of 2014 in CWP No.16970 of 1995 101/5 Dhian Singh v. The Asstt. Collector, Kurukshetra and ORS.Present:- Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the applicant CM No.4550 of 2014 : This application


May 09 2014

Gurmukh Singh V. the Asstt. Collector, Kurukshetra and ors. Vs. Unknow ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-09-2014

RA No.221 of 2014 with CM No.4563-64 of 2014 in CWP No.16976 of 1995 101/11 Gurmukh Singh v. The Asstt. Collector, Kurukshetra and ORS.Present:- Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the applicant CM No.4563 of 2014 : This application


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 04 2003

Dr. Gurmeet Singh V Ito

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Feb-04-2003

Reported in: (2004)89TTJ(NULL)362

law and against the judicial pronouncement of Honble, Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT v. Pratap Singh Amrao Singh, etc. and CIT v. Hotel Joshi 22 TW 807 (Raj). He has contended that even otherwise


Oct 29 1973

Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Karnail Singh V. Kaleran

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Oct-29-1973

Reported in: [1974]94ITR505(P& H)

far as penalties and their exigibility is concerned we have held in the quantum appeal that Shri Karnail Singh has not been able to prove that the sum as sustained by us did not belong to him … Inspecting Assistant Commissioner levying a penalty of Rs. 50,000. It was urged before the Appellate Tribunal that, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Anwar Ali, [1970] 76 I.T.R. 696;


Apr 03 1978

T. K. Roy Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax. S. Karam Singh V. Commission ...

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Apr-03-1978

under that substantive section could only be leviable. May be the submission was not clear to me.N. IBOTOMBI SINGH J. - (8-7-77). The three references, under section 27 of the W.T. Act, 1957, by the Income-tax, Tribunal, … showed cause but it was not accepted in its entirety by the W.T.O., who, as a result, imposed various penalties for different periods of defaults. The periods of default were found by him to be 88, 76,


Jan 17 1974

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Harbans Singh Overruled in Pritam Singh ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-17-1974

Reported in: [1975]98ITR331(P& H)

Tribunal have been summarised in para. 3 of the statement of the case as under :'One Shri Udham Singh of village Reru, Distt. Jullundur, was a Jat. He died on June 18, 1960. The deceased was a … assessment was to be made under section 7 read with section 39 of the Estate Duty Act, in view of the passage of the Hindu Succession Act 1956 ?'The facts as found by the Tribunal have been


Sep 22 2000

Smt. Tej Kumari Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors., Uday Mistana ...

Court: Patna

Decided on: Sep-22-2000

Matched in: Parties Smt. Tej Kumari Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors., Uday Mistana Bhandar V. Cit and ors., Govind Mahto V. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors., Sardar Santosh Singh V. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.


Sep 30 1996

income Tax Officer Vs. Rakesh Singh. Ito V. Prem Singh. (ita No. 8422/ ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-30-1996

Reported in: (1998)60TTJ(Del)674

admitted to be disposed of on merits.2. Out of four appeals filed, in the case of Shri Kamal Singh appeals have been filed both by the assessed as well by the Revenue. In the cases of Shri … the return for asst. yr. 1986-87 wherein the investment in fine silver was declared at 15.214 kgs. and valued at Rs. 61,046 and further investment of Rs. 10,000 was shown as advance.6. In the case of Shri


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial