Raj Kumar Raj V State - Law Dictionary Search Results
Trial
stage of the proceeding in a criminal case after the charge had been framed against the accused, Vijay Kumar v. State, 1977 CLR J&K 37 (41): 1977 FAJ 526. Trial, is used in the sense of reference to a … between the parties, whether they are of law or of fact, Sajjan Singh v. Bhagilal Pandya, AIR 1958 Raj 307. Trial, is understood as referring to the stage of the proceeding in a criminal case after the
Law
is his command which has to be obeyed by the citizens whether they agree with it or not, Raj Kumar Nursing Pratap Singh Deo v. State of Orissa, AIR 1964 SC 1793 (1797). It includes any Ordinance, order
Dowry
at the time of marriage but also includes demand made subsequent to marriage, State of Andhra Pradesh v. Raj Kumar Asava, AIR 2004 SC 1933 (1936); see also Vidhya Devi v. State of Haryana, (2004) 9 SCC 476.
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Lex non cogit ad impossibilia
to imopossible ends. See State of Rajasthan v. Shamsher Singh, 1985 Supp SCC 416: AIR 1985 SC 1082; Raj Kumar Dey v. Tarapado Dey, (1987) 4 SCC 398: AIR 1987 SC 2195; Vinod Krishna Kaul v. Union of
Basa land
Basa comprises both cultivated and uncultivated lands, uncultivated land includes Banzar Kadeem which in turn includes unmeasured forests, Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (1990) 4 SCC 320: AIR 1990 SC 1833 (1844).
Entitled
a right or claim to the usufruct in its own right and not as the agent of another, Raj Kumar Rajindra Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (1990) 4 SCC 320: AIR 1990 SC 1833 (1847). [Forest Act,
Malwa
of a fallen building and cannot mean existing constructions and the land on which the 'malwa' are kept, Raj Kumar Soni v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2000 All 1.
Actus curiae neminem gravabit.
145, (para 16); See Also CIT v. B. N. Bhattacharjee, (1979) 4 SCC 121: AIR 1979 SC 1725; Raj Kumar Dey v. Taropado Dey, (1987) 4 SCC 398; AIR 1987 SC 2195, Nand Kishore Morwah v. Samundri Devi, … 1991 SC 373: Hanuman Vitamin Foods (P) Ltd, v. CCE , (1998) 8 SCC 336; Mansukhlal Vithaldas Chauhan v. State of Gujarat, (1997) 7 SC 622: AIR 1997 SC 3400; West Bengal Essential Commodities Supply Corp. v. Swadesh
Judgment
if the case were to be committed to a Court of Session, Rajender Kumar Jain v. State through Special Police Establishment, AIR 1980 SC 1510 … judgment must be a decision pronounced by a court in cause which it hears on the merits, Hans Kumar v. Union of India, AIR 1958 SC 947. Means 'the result of judging; the decision or con-clusion reached, as … right, recognises the commission of the injury, or negatives the allegation of one or the other, Gurdit Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1974 SC 1791 (1794): (1974) 2 SCC 260: (1974) 3 SCR 896. In finding out
Office of profit
was drawing a honorarium was not holding an office of profit, Umrao Singh v. Yeshwant Singh, AIR 1970 Raj 134 (141). [Constitution of India, Art. 102(1)(a)] It need not be in the service of Government. Generally it … Government, a person need not be in the service of the Government, Satrucharla Chandrasekhar Raju v. Vyricherla Pradeep Kumar Devi, AIR 1992 SC 1959: (1992) 4 SCC 404. The word 'office' does not, therefore, necessarily imply that … A medical practitioner working as a panel doctor appointed under the Employees' State Insurance Scheme does not hold 'office of profit' under the State Government,
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
Try the research workspace - 7 days free