Kumar V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Judgment
judgment must be a decision pronounced by a court in cause which it hears on the merits, Hans Kumar v. Union of India, AIR 1958 SC 947. Means 'the result of judging; the decision or con-clusion reached, as
Cause of action
fact which it is necessary to establish to support a right to obtain a judgment, Prem Chand Vijay Kumar v. Yashpal Singh, (2005) 4 SCC 417. Is a bundle of facts which are required to proof for obtaining
Stridhan
the wife and the husband has no title or independent dominion over the property as owner thereof, Rashmi Kumar v. Mahesh Kumar, 1977 SCC (Cri) 415: (1997) 2 SCC 397. Stridhana, the properties gifted to her before the … the husband and the husband has no title or independent dominion over the property as owner thereof, Rashmi Kumar v. Mahesh Kumar Bhola, (1997) 2 SCC 397 (406).
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Special circumstances
neither practicable nor advisable to enumerate such circumstances. Non-service of summons will undoubtedly be a special circumstance, Rajni Kumar v. Suresh Kumar Malhotra, (2003) 5 SCC 315. (Civil PC, 1908, O. 37, R. 4) In its ordinary dictionary … neither practicable nor advisable to enumerate such circumstances. Non-service of summons will undoubtedly be a special circumstance, Rajni Kumar v. Suresh Kumar Malhotra, AIR 2003 SC 1322: (2003) 5 SCC 315.
Cognizance
'the exercise jurisdiction' or 'power to try and determine to causes'. In common sense taking notice of, Rakesh Kumar Mishra v. State of Bihar, (2006) 1 SCC 557. Means 'jurisdiction' or the exercise or jurisdiction or power
Trade
State of Maharashtra, 1973 Mah LJ 420. Trade, includes every kind of trade business, pro-fession or occupation, Mahesh Kumar v. State of Gujarat, 1975 SLWR 74: (1974) 15 Guj LR 293. Trade, includes persons in a line of
Shall
duty in performing a prescribed act that could make an action totally ineffective or void ab initio, Krishna Kumar Mediratta v. Phulchand Agarwala, AIR 1977 SC 984 (986): (1977) 2 SCC 5: (1977) 2 SCR 702. (viii) … to take action, Labour Commissioner v. Burhanpur Tapti Mills Ltd., AIR 1964 SC 1687: (1964) 7 SCR 484. (v) The use of the word 'shall' in a statute does not always indicate that the provisions are mandatory in
Maintenance
Saha, AIR 1967 Cal 603. Include provision for food, clothing, residence, education, medical attendance and treatment, Thulasikumar Anil Kumar v. Raghavan Nair, AIR 1985 Ker 20. If any person having sufficient means neglects or refuses to maintain: (a)
Trial
stage of the proceeding in a criminal case after the charge had been framed against the accused, Vijay Kumar v. State, 1977 CLR J&K 37 (41): 1977 FAJ 526. Trial, is used in the sense of reference to
Possession
applicable to all situations in the contexts of all statues. Supdt. & Remembrancer of Legal Affairs v. Anil Kumar Bhunja, AIR 1980 SC 52 (55). [Arms Act, 1959, s. 29(b)] Possession must be conscious passion. Sub-Divisional Officer
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free