Cammer V United - Law Dictionary Search Results
prior restraint
by publication) before the expression actually takes place see also Near v. Minnesota and New York Times Co. v. United States in the Important Cases section compare censorship, freedom of speech NOTE: In New York Times Co. v.
Judgment
to allow the amendment, a judgment in terms of clause 15 of the Letters Patent, Prasant Chandra Sen v. United Commercial Bank, AIR 1982 Cal 555. An end to the suit or proceeding, the adjudication is indisputably a
Salary or wages
payment, or promise of payment of a price; and (4) the passing of the title, State of Bombay v. United Motors (India) Ltd., AIR 1953 SC 252: (1953) SCR 1059: (1953) SCJ 373: (1953) SCA 408: 55 BLJR
Keep your definitions linked to case research
McNabb-Mallory rule
McNabb-Mallory rule [after McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943) and Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449 (1957), U.S. Supreme Court cases
McNabb-Mallory rule
the broader protections afforded under the Mioranda rule, the McNabb-Mallory rule is rarely applied in modern cases, McNabb v. United States, 318 US 332, 63 S.Ct. 608 (1943); Mallory v. United States, 354 US 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356
Solicitor
1934 (24 & 25 Geo. 5, c. 45), passed as a result of the decision in Law Society v. United Services Bureau, (1934) 1 KB 343, which decided that 'person' in the 1932 Act meant natural person, so
Volenti non fit injuria
& Son, (1935) 1 KB 146; contra if the risk was undertaken voluntarily and not under duty, Cutler v. United Dairies (London) Ltd., (1933) 2 KB 297; and see Rescue and Voluntary Assumption of Risk, by Professor Goodhart,
Consummation
uses the goods and therefore 'consumes' them even though he does not keep them himself, State of Bombay v. United Motors (India) Ltd., AIR 1953 SC 252 (266). [Constitution of India, Art. 286(1) Expl.] 'Consumption' is a word
Consumption and use
uses the goods and therefore 'consumes' them even though he does not keep them himself, State of Bombay v. United Motors (India) Ltd., AIR 1953 SC 252 (266). [Constitution of India, Art. 286(1) Expl.] 'Consumption' is a word
Injunction
qualified by an adjective and, therefore, it would, comprehend both interim and perpetual injunc-tion, Cotton Corporation of India v. United Industries Ltd., AIR 1983 SC 1272 (1277): (1983) 4 SCC 625. [Specific Relief Act, 1963, s. 41(b)] This
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free