Cammer V United - Judgment Search Results
Cammer Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-12-1956
Cammer v. United States - 350 U.S. 399 (1956) U.S. Supreme Court Cammer v. United States, 350 U.S. 399 (1956) Cammer … Cammer v. United States - 350 U.S. 399 (1956) U.S. Supreme Court Cammer v. United States, 350 U.S. 399 (1956) Cammer v. United States No. 110 Argued January 24, 1956 Decided March 12,
United States Vs. Dixon
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-02-1992
contempt, possesses old roots in the Court's cases. See United States v. Wilson, 421 U. S. 309 (1975); Cammer v. United States, 350 U. S. 399 (1956); Nye v. United States, 313 U. S. 33 , 47-52 (1941); Cooke
Ferri Vs. Ackerman
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-04-1979
A.2d [281,] 283 [(1972)]. This comports with the view of the Court expressed by Mr. Justice Black in Cammer v. United States, 350 U. S. 399 (1956):" "It has been stated many times that lawyers are 'officers of the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Supreme Court of N.H. Vs. Piper
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-04-1985
best judgment, collects his own fees, and runs his own business.'" Id. at 413 U. S. 729 (quoting Cammer v. United States, 350 U. S. 399 , 350 U. S. 405 (1956)). Moreover, we held that the state powers
United States Vs. Barnett
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-06-1964
Sacher v. United States, 343 U. S. 1 (1952); Offutt v. United States, 348 U. S. 11 (1954); Cammer v. United States, 350 U. S. 399 (1956); Nilva v. United States, 352 U. S. 385 (1957); Yates v. United
Harris Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-06-1965
313 U. S. 52 -53; In re Michael, 326 U. S. 224 , 326 U. S. 227 ; Cammer v. United States, 350 U. S. 399 , 350 U. S. 404 . [ Footnote 3 ] Rule 42(a) was
Temple Vs. U.S.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1967
Ex parte Hudgings, 249 U.S. 378 ; see In re McConnell, 370 U.S. 230 , 234, 236; cf. Cammer v. United States, 350 U.S. 399 ; Brown v. United States, 356 U.S. 148, 153 . Petitioner, an attorney, represented
Bloom Vs. Illinois
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-20-1968
purpose to fence in the power of the federal courts to punish contempt summarily was further implemented in Cammer v. United States, 350 U. S. 399 , 350 U. S. 407 -408 (1956). A lawyer, the Court held, "is … also Ex parte Hudgings, 249 U. S. 378 (1919); Nye v. United States, 313 U. S. 33 (1941); Cammer v. United States, 350 U. S. 399 (1956). [ Footnote 5 ] Section 1 of the Act of 1831 stated:
In Re Griffiths
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1973
294 A.2d at 283. This comports with the view of the Court expressed by Mr. Justice Black in Cammer v. United States, 350 U. S. 399 (1958): "It has been stated many times that lawyers are 'officers of the
Konigsberg Vs. State Bar of California
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-06-1957
of our disposition of the case, it is unnecessary to consider this argument. [ Footnote 36 ] See Cammer v. United States, 350 U. S. 399 , 350 U. S. 406 -407. Compare Chafee, the Harvard Law School Record,
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free