Did you mean: 1997 7 sec 298?
1997 7 Scc 298 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Salary or wages
the import stream, such import falls within the expression 'sale occasions import', State of Maharashtra v. Embee Corporation, (1997) 7 SCC 190. Sale, taking place not only during the activities directed to the end of the exportation of the
Confession
would incriminate him unless urged by the promptings of truth and conscience, Sahib Singh v. State of Haryana, (1997) 7 SCC 231: AIR 1997 SC 3247 (3254). [Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention), Act, 1987, s. 15] The word 'confession'
Development
establishment of industries is one of the modes of developing an area, Gujarat Industrial Development Corpn. v. C.I.T., (1997) 7 SCC 17 (20): AIR 1997 SC 3275. The word 'development' in the BDA Act is defined as development with
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Sanction
the sanctioning authority had considered the evidence and other material placed before it, Mansuklal v. State of Gujarat, (1997) 7 SCC 622: (1977) SCC (Cri) 1120. Sanction, is purely an executive function and not judicial function of the government
Post-graduate research or specialist qualification
as a post-graduate research or specialist qualification, Counsel of Scientific & Industrial Research, New Delhi v. M.V. Sastry, (1997) 7 SCC 494.
Goods
lawyer as his lien for the purpose of realizing his fee, R.D. Saxena v. Balram Prasad Sharma, (2000) 7 SCC 264; Also Bailey's large dictionary of 1732; Webster's dictionary and Dr. Johnson's Dictionary. See also C.C.E. v. Eastend
Food
2(v) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Godawal Pan Masala Products Ltd. v. Union of India, (2004) 7 SCC 68 (101): AIR 2004 SC 4057. Food. In the Sale of Food and Drugs Act (see ADULTERATION) the
Cause of action
entitles a party to maintain action in court or tribunal, Navinchandra N. Majithia v. State of Maharastra, (2000) 7 SCC 640 [Civil Procedure Code, 1908, s. 20). The expression 'cause of action' is generally understood to mean a
Shall
factor in deciding whether a provision is mandatory or directory, Graphite India Ltd. v. Durgapur Projects Ltd., (1999) 7 SCC 645. Shall, is not conclusive of the question whether a provision is mandatory, Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmad
Turnover
be taken into account while computing the turnover, Secy. Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers v. Cipla Ltd., (2003) 7 SCC 1 (13, 23). [Drug Policy, 1994, Para 22.7 2(i) and 9] Turnover, includes tax thus tax becomes, for
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free