1974 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Judgment
the injury, or negatives the allegation of one or the other, Gurdit Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1974 SC 1791 (1794): (1974) 2 SCC 260: (1974) 3 SCR 896. In finding out whether the order is
Joining together
of distinction of elements that completely merge with one another, Ramashankar Kaushik v. Election Commission of India, AIR 1974 SC 445: (1974) 1 SCC 271. [Election Symbols (Reservations and Allot-ment Order, 1968, Para. 16(1)] There is nothing
Factory
of the Mines Act, 1952 or a railway running shed, B.M. Lakshmanamurthy v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation, AIR 1974 SC 759: (1974) 4 SCC 365: (1974) 3 SCR 142. Means a factory as defined in clause (m)
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Food
food within the meaning of s. 2(v) of the Act, Pyarali K. Tejani v. Mahadeo Ramachandra Dange, AIR 1974 SC 228 (234). [Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, s. 2 (v)] Means any article of nourishment for
Virulent
be referred to as the corresponding Sanskrit word for 'virulent', Swarajya Lakshmi v. Dr. G.G. Padma Rao, AIR 1974 SC 165: (1974) 1 SCC 58: (1974) 2 SCR 97. [Hindu Marriage Act (25 of 1955), s. 13(i)
The premises
of a building let separately, Raja Bahadur Motilal Bombay Mills Ltd. v. Govind Ram Brothers (P) Ltd., AIR 1974 SC 1708: (1974) 2 SCC 178: (1974) 3 SCR 577. [Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control
Right of suit and right of appeal
why the right of appeal is described as a creature of statute, Ganga Bai v. Vijay Kumar, AIR 1974 SC 1126: (1974) 2 SCC 393: (1974) 3 SCR 882.
Step in aid of execution of the decree
order to maintain his title to and possession of the suit property, Prem Raj v. Ram Charan, AIR 1974 SC 968: (1974) 3 SCR 494: (1974) 2 SCC 1. (Limitation Act, 1908, Art. 182)
Stock
that it can be said to have been 'stocked' for sale, S.K. Amir v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1974 SC 469: (1974) 4 SCC 210: (1974) 3 SCR 84. [Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, ss. 18(a) and
Supplies and services
community and the order is not bad because it telescopes both, Jagdish Prasad v. State of Bihar, AIR 1974 SC 911: (1974) 4 SCC 455: (1974) 3 SCR 369. Indulging in black-marketing is conduct which is prejudicial
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free