X Said - Judgment Search Results
X Vs. Registrar General
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-10-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1137 OF2018MS. X ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. The petitioner … at District Entry Level (direct recruitment from Bar) conducted in the year 2011, and stood 2nd in the said examination. On her selection, the petitioner was posted as a 2nd to 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge
X Vs. The Principal Secretary Health And Family Welfare Department Gov ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-29-2022
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 5802 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No 12612 of 2022) X ... Appellant versus The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. … it excludes an unmarried woman. Whether such rule is valid or not can be decided only after the said rule is held ultra vires, for which purpose, notice has to be issued in the writ petition and
X Vs. Union Of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-16-2023
COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION Miscellaneous Application No.2157 of 2023 in Writ Petition (Civil) No.1137 of 2023 X … Petitioner Versus Union of India and Anr. …Respondents 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of
18-section briefs on any result in this list
X Vs. Y
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-08-2024
125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, claiming maintenance against the appellant. On 19th October 2013, the said petition was partly Civil Appeal No.7210 of 2024 Page 2 of 12 allowed. The Trial Court denied maintenance … dismissed the appeal preferred by the respondent and confirmed the decree for restitution of conjugal rights. In paragraph 10 of the decision, the High Court held thus: “…………The trial court has rightly drawn the conclusion that the
X versus State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-27-2024
Reported in: [2024]11S.C.R.941
[2024] 11 S.C.R. 941 : 2024 INSC 909 X v. State of Rajasthan & Anr. (Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 13378 of 2024) 27 November 2024 [J.B. … as both the accused are residing in the very same village, the accused directed not to enter the said village till the completion of the trial. [Paras 17-20] Judicial deprecation - Bail application of the accused in
X versus the State of Uttar Pradesh & Another
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-09-2026
Reported in: [2026] 1 S.C.R. 484
[2026] 1 S.C.R. 484 : 2026 INSC 44 X v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another (Criminal Appeal No. 164 of 2026) 09 January 2026 [B.V. … filing Criminal Misc. BailApplication No. 9829 of 2025. By the impugned judgmentdated 09.04.2025, the High Court allowed the said application and enlarged Respondent No. 2 on bail, subject to certain conditions. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant has preferred
X versus O/O Speaker of the House of People & Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-16-2026
Reported in: [2026] 2 S.C.R. 200
[2026] 2 S.C.R. 200 : 2026 INSC 65 X v. O/o Speaker of the House of People & Ors. (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1233 of 2025) 16 … a notice of motion is accepted in one House and rejected in the other - To interpret the said proviso in the manner suggested by the petitioner would require to read into it a disabling consequence, namely,
X Vs Y
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 214/2025 and I.A. 6283/2025 HERO INVESTCORP PVT.LTD & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Kunal Khanna, Mr. Madhav Anand, Mr. Krtin Bhasin, Mr. Udit Sharma, Mr. Kaulik...
X vs State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2026
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 20th May, 2026. Uploaded on: 23rd May, 2026 + CRL.A. 356/2019 X .....Appellant Through: Ms. Supriya Juneja and Ms. Shreya Lamba, Advs. (M: 9711347312)versusSTATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ritesh … her.79. File be consigned to record room.”3. The State had earlier sought leave to file appeal against the saidjudgment by way of a criminal leave petition being CRL.L.P. 634/2018. Videorder dated 1st October, 2018, a Coordinate Bench
X vs State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2026
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 31.01.2026Judgment delivered on : 22.05.2026+ CRL.REV.P. 549/2023 & CRL.M.A. 13130/2023 X .....PetitionerversusSTATE & ORS. .....Respondents + CRL.REV.P. 704/2023 & CRL.M.A. 17091/2023, CRL.M.A. X .....PetitionerversusSTATE THROUGH GOVT NCT OF DELHI … friends has been organized on 29th December 2020 during the day time around noon and it was also said that the party shall be held at House xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, New Delhi. Annanya told me to meet her at
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free