X Vs Y

X vs Y

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Feb 06, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1260379

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1260379
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Jyoti Singh
Decided On: Feb 06, 2026
Case Number: CS(COMM)/214/2025
Subject: Intellectual Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Intellectual Property

Key legal issue: Intellectual Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Advocate Mr. Kunal Khanna, Mr. Madhav Anand, Mr. Krtin Bhasin, Mr. Udit Sharma, Mr. Kaulik Mitra, Ms. Priyanshi Gupta, Mr. Rishab Gupta, Mr. S.K. Verma

Respondent

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ cs(comm) 214/2025 and i.a. 6283/2025 hero investcorp pvt.ltd & anr. .....plaintiffs through: mr. kunal khanna, mr. madhav anand, mr. krtin bhasin, mr. udit sharma, mr. kaulik mitra, ms. priyanshi gupta and mr. rishab gupta, advocates.versuss.k. clutch components .....defendant through: mr. s.k. verma, advocate with defendant in person.coram:hon'ble ms. justice jyoti singhorder% 06.02.20261. this suit is instituted on behalf of the plaintiffs seekingpermanent/perpetual injunction against infringement of trademark, copyright, counterfeiting, delivery up, rendition of accounts and damages etc.2. during the course of the proceedings, parties were referred before thedelhi high court mediation and conciliation centre, where they have amicably resolved their inter se disputes and have executed a settlement agreement on 04.02.2026 incorporating the terms of settlement. in light of this, counsel for the plaintiffs, on instructions, submits that the suit be decreed in terms of the settlement agreement.3. court has perused the settlement agreement and finds the same to becs(comm) 214/2025 page 1 of 2 lawful.4. accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of the settlement which shallform a part of the decree and the terms therein shall bind the parties.5. registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet.6. suit stands disposed of along with pending application.7. plaintiffs are held entitled to refund of entire court fee in accordancewith court fees act, 1870.jyoti singh, jfebruary 6, 2026/yacs(comm) 214/2025 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(COMM) 214/2025 and I.A. 6283/2025 HERO INVESTCORP PVT.LTD & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Kunal Khanna, Mr. Madhav Anand, Mr. Krtin Bhasin, Mr. Udit Sharma, Mr. Kaulik Mitra, Ms. Priyanshi Gupta and Mr. Rishab Gupta, Advocates.

versus

S.K. CLUTCH COMPONENTS .....Defendant Through: Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate with Defendant in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

ORDER

% 06.02.2026

1. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiffs seeking

permanent/perpetual injunction against infringement of trademark, copyright, counterfeiting, delivery up, rendition of accounts and damages etc.

2. During the course of the proceedings, parties were referred before the

Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where they have amicably resolved their inter se disputes and have executed a Settlement Agreement on 04.02.2026 incorporating the terms of settlement. In light of this, counsel for the Plaintiffs, on instructions, submits that the suit be decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement.

3. Court has perused the Settlement Agreement and finds the same to be

CS(COMM) 214/2025 Page 1 of 2 lawful.

4. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of the settlement which shall

form a part of the decree and the terms therein shall bind the parties.

5. Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet.

6. Suit stands disposed of along with pending application.

7. Plaintiffs are held entitled to refund of entire Court fee in accordance

with Court Fees Act, 1870.

JYOTI SINGH, J

FEBRUARY 6, 2026/YA

CS(COMM) 214/2025 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2026 Same Parties X vs Y Same Subject Intellectual Property Same Judge Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Jyoti Singh