Written Statement - Judgment Search Results
“written Statement Is Not Filed by the Defendants. Vs. Ajay Sharma
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-04-2014
the order dated 22.8.2013 dismissing an application filed by the petitioners for condoning the delay in filing the written statement. As a matter of fact, on 07.6.2012, defence of the petitioners was struck off in the following order:- … As a matter of fact, on 07.6.2012, defence of the petitioners was struck off in the following order:- “Written statement is not filed by the defendants. Although, they appeared in the Court on 07.03.2012. Further request is made
“on 23.12.2009 Written Statements and Oral Arguments of the Vs. Gurb ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
and 2 filed CWP No.8906 of 2010. Upon notice, appearance was put in by the appellants. In the written statement filed, it was specifically stated that as per Warabandi (turn of water) fixed by the Canal Authorities, watercouRs.starting
“defendants in their Written Statement Admitted the Fact of Vs. Gram ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
in favour of the Gram Panchayat, the same would be binding inter se between the parties.4. In the written statement filed by respondent No.1, it has been averred that the petitioner is guilty of concealing material facts before … I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.2488 of 1987 -6- “Defendants in their written statement admitted the fact of possession of plaintiffs. They also admitted that the suit land was Banjar Qadim at
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“In This Case the Defendants Have Filed the Written Statement on 27. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-04-2014
defendants”.) from alienating the disputed land in any manner. The defendants contested the claim of plaintiffs, filed the written statement, stoutly denied all the allegations contained in the plaint and prayed for dismissal of the suit.2. During the … P3), which, in substance, is as under (para 8) :- “In this case, the defendants have filed the written statement on 27.10.2005 and in para No.8 of the written statement they have specifically mentioned that none of the
The Respondents Have Filed their Written Statement Vs. State of Punjab ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-05-2014
could not submit objections and, thus, have been afforded no opportunity of hearing. The respondents have filed their written statement controverting the petitioneRs.claim. It is averred that vide notification dated 07.05.2013 [P-2]., which was duly published in two
Amendment Sought in His Written Statement by the Petitioner- Vs. Ashok ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
Mr.Raj Kumar Chandana, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J. (Oral) 1. Amendment sought in his written statement by the petitioner- tenant has been declined vide order dated 7.5.2014 (Annexure P-5) because the tenant wanted to … the admissions already made by the tenant, there was no merit in the request for amendment of his written statement sought by him. It is correctly observed by the Rent Controller that amendment sought for by the Mohan
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free