Workmen - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: workmen Page 1 of about 970 results (0.021 seconds)Workmen Vs. Management of Dunlop Rubber Company of India Limited
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1973SC2394; [1973(27)FLR37]; (1973)IILLJ321SC; (1973)2SCC492; [1974]1SCR228
of the normal business of a company in which the workmen were also engaged, that income must be included in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorkmen Vs. Williamson Magor and Co. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1982SC78; (1982)ILLJ33SC; 1981(3)SCALE1825; (1982)1SCC117; [1982]2SCR42; 1982(1)SLJ163(SC); 1982(14)LC79(SC)
herewith is justified To what relief, if any, are the workmen marked in Annexure 'A' entitled The names of the persons
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorkmen Vs. Management of India Forge and Drop Stampings Ltd., and ors
Court: Chennai
Reported in: [1996(74)FLR2052]
held to be a case of closure and that the workmen are not entitled to any relief. 9. The union appears
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorkmen Vs. Rohtas Industries Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: JT1995(7)SC629; 1995Supp(1)SCC171
Rehabilitation Commissioner shall pay the arrears of wages of the workmen for the past two months.4. Against the demand of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorkmen Vs. Management of Sijua (Jherriah) Electric Supply Co Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1973SC2766; 1975(0)BLJR135; 1973LabIC1621; (1973)IILLJ488SC; (1974)3SCC473; [1974]1SCR760; 1973(5)LC892(SC)
for the purpose of ascertaining the bonus payable to the workmen under the provisions of the Bonus Act. The balance-sheet of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorkmen Vs. Balmer Lawrie and Co. Ltd., Bombay
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: 1980Supp(1)SCC683; 1980(12)LC94(SC)
the narrow point of dispute between the management and the workmen on the question of additional D.A. which was the subject
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorkmen Vs. I.i.T.i. Cycles of India Ltd. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: (1995)IILLJ688bSC; 1995Supp(2)SCC733
the ground that they commanded membership of minority of the workmen. We do not read the said order as such. Lastly,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorkmen Vs. J.K. Jute Mills Co. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: (1996)IILLJ689SC; 1995Supp(4)SCC58
with effect from September 25, 1975. An agreement between the workmen and employers came about on August 26, 1975, earlier in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Dunlop Rubber Co. Vs. Workmen
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1965SC1392; [1966(12)FLR372]; (1965)ILLJ426SC; [1965]2SCR139
the Company can assist. Technically, therefore, the demand of the workmen that they should be represented by their own Union could
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtic Industries Ltd. Vs. Workmen
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1972SC1234; [1972(24)FLR296]; 1972LabIC632; (1972)IILLJ20SC; (1972)2SCC88; [1972]3SCR770
granted an allowance of 12 paise per day to the workmen of Cynamid India Ltd., who were staying beyond three miles
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>