Within The Meaning Of - Judgment Search Results
Means Vs. U.S.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1984
MEANS v. U.S. - 469 U.S. 1058 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court MEANS v. U.S. , 469 U.S. 1058 (1984)
Means Vs. Dowd
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-17-1888
Means v. Dowd - 128 U.S. 583 (1888) U.S. Supreme Court Means v. Dowd, 128 U.S. 583 (1888) Means
Means Vs. Dowd
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-10-1888
Bankrupt Act against a preference of creditors in fraud of the act, because the proceedings were not commenced within the time prescribed by that act as necessary to avoid a preference, yet a right is shown to relief … Means v. Dowd - 128 U.S. 273 (1888) U.S. Supreme Court Means v. Dowd, 128 U.S. 273 (1888) Means
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Means Vs. Bank of Randall
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-19-1892
Means v. Bank of Randall - 146 U.S. 620 (1892) U.S. Supreme Court Means v. Bank of Randall, 146
Donaldson Vs. Means
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1791
DONALDSON v. MEANS - 4 U.S. 109 (1791) U.S. Supreme Court DONALDSON v. MEANS, 4 U.S. 109 (1791) 4 U.S. 109
Basaratulla Mean and ors. Vs. ReazuddIn Mean and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-09-1926
Reported in: AIR1926Cal773,96Ind.Cas.705
must be discharged for the following reasons: In the first place I cannot see how either order comes within the mischief of Section 115, C.P.C.3. Take first of all the order of the learned Munsif refusing to review … proceedings in execution otherwise than under Section 141, it is necessary for the Court to decide what is the meaning and effect of that section. Now, the construction of Section 141 and of Section 617 (the corresponding section
MoyzuddIn Mean Vs. Emperor
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-10-1929
Reported in: 124Ind.Cas.70
Mukerji, J.1. This Rule must be made absolute. The petitioner was not examined under Section 342, Criminal Procedure Code. The Courts below appear to have taken the view that that section is not applicable to a...
Abdul Karim Mean Vs. Miajan Mianji and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-24-1915
Reported in: 32Ind.Cas.232
1. The plaintiff-appellant sued to recover possession of the land in dispute, on the ground that it had been surrendered to him by defendant No. 4, who was one of the tenants who held the tenure...
Mega Vishwanath Iyer Vs. Unfair Means Enquiry Committee of S.K. Somaiy ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-28-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALLMR827
that even though she was unintentionally carrying her mobile phone in her pocket, she immediately handed it over within ten minutes to the Supervisor and she had not taken advantage of the same in any manner and … advantage of the same in any manner and that, therefore, the penalty awarded to her by the Unfair Means Enquiry Committee of S.K. Somaiya College of Arts, Science and Commerce (hereafter 'the Committee') is not in accordance
Havaldar Roy and anr. Vs. Jagu Mean
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-06-1882
Reported in: (1883)ILR9Cal96
Maclean, J.1. The petitioners were tried before a Bench of Magistrates at Jugdespore on a charge of an offence under Section 352. The Bench was composed of an Assistant Magistrate with second class powers and three...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free