Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Means Vs. Dowd

Means vs Dowd

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-17-1888
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/85789

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
128 U.S. 583
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Means

Respondent

Dowd

Excerpt

means v. dowd - 128 u.s. 583 (1888) u.s. supreme court means v. dowd, 128 u.s. 583 (1888) means v. dowd no. 47 submitted and decided december 17, 1888 128 u.s. 583 appeal from the circuit court of the united states for the western district of north carolina syllabus the court denies a motion for an order for a mandate, no notice of it having been given to the other party. it has been the custom with the court to make a general order, immediately before the commencement of the february recess, for the issue of mandates in every case disposed of prior to the 1st of january if application therefor should be made, except in cases in which a petition for rehearing might be pending, and cases docketed and dismissed under the 9th rule. in this case, which is reported ante, page 128 u. s. 273 , application was made to the court for the immediate issue of a mandate without giving the other party notice of the intention to make such a motion. per curiam. no notice having been given to the other side, and there being no agreement of the parties that the mandate may issue, the motion is denied.

Full Judgment

Means v. Dowd - 128 U.S. 583 (1888)
U.S. Supreme Court Means v. Dowd, 128 U.S. 583 (1888)

Means v. Dowd

No. 47

Submitted and decided December 17, 1888

128 U.S. 583

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

SYLLABUS

The Court denies a motion for an order for a mandate, no notice of it having been given to the other party.

It has been the custom with the Court to make a general order, immediately before the commencement of the February recess, for the issue of mandates in every case disposed of prior to the 1st of January if application therefor should be made, except in cases in which a petition for rehearing might be pending, and cases docketed and dismissed under the 9th rule. In this case, which is reported ante, page 128 U. S. 273 , application was made to the Court for the immediate issue of a mandate without giving the other party notice of the intention to make such a motion.

PER CURIAM.

No notice having been given to the other side, and there being no agreement of the parties that the mandate may issue, the motion is

Denied.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial