Wages - Judgment Search Results

MichelIn Tire Corp. Vs. Wages

Court: US Supreme Court

Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages - 423 U.S. 276 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, 423 U.S. 276 (1976) Michelin

Payment of Wages Inspector Vs. Surajmal Mehta and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1969SC590; 1969(17)BLJR821; [1969(18)FLR284]; (1969)ILLJ762SC; 1969MhLJ848(SC); [1969]2SCR1051

of Madhya Pradesh andraises the question of the scope of jurisdiction of the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, 4 of 1936 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). 2. On the licence of the Barnagar Electric

Mageria Daily Wages Workers Union and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (1996)ILLJ389Raj; 1995(1)WLC706

the Labourers and petitioner No. 2 is its President and in this petition, they have claimed the minimum wages to be paid to the labourers who were employed for carrying out the projects under the Jawahar Rozgar

P.C. Agarwala Vs. Payment of Wages Inspector, M.P. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC3576; [2005]127CompCas787(SC); (2005)6CompLJ227(SC); [2005(107)FLR826]; JT2005(8)SC544; 2005(7)SCALE519; (2005)8SCC104; [2005]63SCL109(SC); 2006(1)SLJ24(SC)

Jiyajirao Cotton Mills Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'Company') to be personally liable for the payment of wages to the workmen of the company under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (in short the 'Act'). However,

Subhash Gupta and ors. Vs. Payment of Wages Authority (Astt. Labour Co ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2008(119)FLR707]; (2009)IILLJ67All

as the Mills). They moved an application under Section 15 read with Section 16 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (hereinafter referred to as the 1936 Act) The claim application was registered as P.W, Case No.

Executive Engineer (O and M), Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. and anr ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (2004)ILLJ1125Raj

J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the impugned orders passed by the Authority Under Payment of Wages Act dated February 26, 1999 and the appellate order dated July 5, 2003.2. The Authority Under Payment of

Principal and Director, Motilal Nehru School of Sports Vs. Authority, ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

There is no dispute that the claimants who had filed an application under Section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for short 'the Act'), were paid less than minimum rates of wages fixed for the scheduled

Ramala Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd. Vs. Payment of Wages Authority-cum-con ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1995(70)FLR58]; (1995)ILLJ1067All

registered Co-operative Sugar Mill under the provisions of U.P. Co-operative Societies Act. The respondent No. 3, Payment of Wages Inspector, District Meerut who has the jurisdiction to deal with the petitioner's Mill, inasmuch as, the jurisdiction of

Andhra Pradesh Road Transport Corporation Vs. Payment of Wages Authori ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (1970)ILLJ700AP

the issue of a writ of certiorari to quash the order of the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act dated 6 October 1965.2. The relevant facts are that respondent 2, who was working as supervisor-in-charge at

Ganpatlal Mulchandji Joshi Vs. Payment of Wages Authority (Civil Judge ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1958)IILLJ178Bom

gave birth to a child. Thereafter, she made an application to the Authority constituted under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (IV of 1936), for an order directing the petitioner to pay maternity benefit to her as