Vimlabai Deshpande V Emperor - Judgment Search Results
In Re: Dhruvarajsing Vishwanathsing
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-05-1945
Reported in: AIR1946Bom65; (1945)47BOMLR681
Desai for the petitioner and the Advocate General for the respondents. Mr. D.B. Desai has placed reliance on Vimlabai Deshpande v. Emperor A.I.R [1945] Nag. 8 decided by Bose and Sen JJ. as also on the speech of Lord Atkin, … and mala fide, and would certainly be liable to be impeached.;Liversidge v. Sir John Anderson [1942] A.C. 206, Vimlabai Deshpande v. Emperor [1945] A.I.R. Nag. 8, Emperor v. Bajirao Yamanappa [1945] 47 Bom. L.R. 675 and Dilbagh Singh v. Emperor
Additional District Magistrate, Jabalpur Vs. Shivakant Shukla
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-28-1976
Reported in: AIR1976SC1207; 1976CriLJ945; (1976)2SCC521; [1976]SuppSCR172; 1976(8)LC610(SC)
coming into force of the Constitution in Prabkakar Kesheo Tare and Ors. v. Emperor AIR 1943 Nag. 26. Vimlabai Deshpande v. Emperor A.I.R. 1945 Nag. 8, Htendranath Ghosh v. The Chief Secretary to the Government of Bengal I. L. R.
V.S. Sundaram and anr. Vs. Laisram Achou Singh
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-02-1956
Reported in: 1956CriLJ1411
from the point of view of ascertaining whether the action taken was bona fide or not, vide - 'Vimlabai Deshpande v. Emperor' 1945 Nag 8 (AIR V 32) (Q); - 'Sahadat Ali v. The State of Assam' 1953 Assam 97
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kastoor Chand Vs. Sarkar
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-20-1950
Reported in: AIR1950Raj40
L. J. 303); Teja Singh v. Emperor, A. I. R. (32) 1946 Lah. 293 : (222 I.C. 234); Vimlabai Deshpande v. Emperor, A. I. R. (32) 1945 Nag. 8 : (I. L. R. (1945) Nag. 6) to which the reference
V.S. Sundaram and anr. Vs. Laisram Achou Singh
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-02-1956
Reported in: 1956CriLJ1411
from the point of view of ascertaining whether the action taken was bona fide or not, vide - 'Vimlabai Deshpande v. Emperor' 1945 Nag 8 (AIR V 32) (Q); - 'Sahadat Ali v. The State of Assam' 1953 Assam 97
Jagdish and ors. Vs. Emperor
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-21-1945
Reported in: AIR1946All249
the Criminal Procedure Code was an abuse of them. In Nagpur in the still more recent case in Vimlabai Deshpande v. Emperor ('45) 32 A.I.R. 1945 Nag. 8 two learned Judges of that Court came to substantially the same conclusion.
Binod Rao Vs. Minocher Rustom Masani
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-10-1976
Reported in: (1976)78BOMLR125
of ensuring the public safety and interest and the defence of India and civil defence and internal security.;Vimlabai Deshpande v. Emperor [1945] A.I.R. Nag. 8 King-Emperor v. Vimlabai Deshpande (1946) 48 Bom. L.R. 423, p.c and Mahendrakumar v. State
Maledath Bharathan Malyali Vs. the Commissioner of Police
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-08-1950
Reported in: AIR1950Bom202; (1950)52BOMLR268
a collateral purpose, it is made mala fide, and it cannot be sustained in a Court of law.;Vimlabai Deshpande v. Emperor [1945] A.I.R. Nag. 8, relied on.;Emperor v. Gajanan Krishna Yalgi (1945) 47 Bom. L.R. 669 and In re
Makhan Singh Vs. State of Punjab (and Connected Appeals)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-02-1963
Reported in: AIR1964SC381; 1964CriLJ217; [1964]4SCR797
affect the Jurisdiction conferred on him under section 491 of the Criminal Procedure Code." In King Emperor v. Vimlabai Deshpande(2), a police officer made an arrest of the respondents under sub-rule I of r. 129 of the Defence
State of Haryana and Others Vs. Ch. Bhajan Lal and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-21-1990
Reported in: AIR1992SC604; 1992CriLJ527; JT1990(4)SC650; 1990(2)SCALE1066; 1992Supp(1)SCC335; [1990]Supp3SCR259
Singer Sewing Mach. Co. 32 P. 2d 430, 431, 138 Cal. App. 418. 48. See also Emperor v. Vimlabai Deshpande ; United States v. Cortez 66 L.Ed. 2d (US)(SCR)623 (II (A (3); and Dallison v. Caffery [1964] 2All
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free