Vimlabai Deshpande V Emperor - Law Dictionary Search Results
Same transaction
but a new one in spite of the fact that the same general purpose may continue shapurji sorabji v emperor air 1936 bom 154 debi prasad v emperor 212 ic 135 raj kishore tewari v rex air 1949
Wholesale dealer
dealer is a person who keeps for wholesale to traders a commodity for the purpose of trade manoharbhai v emperor air 1946 nag 248 1945 ilr nag 422 1946 mad lj 319 means a person who buys or
Borrower
of the sons would be liable if the debt is not tainted with illegality or immorality venkatesh dhonddev deshpande v sou kusum dattatraya kulkarni 1979 1 scc 98 114 1979 1 scr 955 air 1978 sc 1791 loans
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Property
property capable of being forcibly destroyed and does not includes an easement of customary right see rudraraju ramaraju v emperor air 1930 mad 973 sumitra v dhannu air 1952 nag 193 property means the highest right a man
Goods
of s 2 of the sale of goods act 1930 should include electricity gas and water ras behari v emperor air 1936 cal 753 country of durham electrical power distribution co v commissioners of inland revenue 1909 2
Possession
prasad jaiswal v kanti gupta 1996 1 blj 45 possession indicates possession with a power of disposal bhagchand v emperor air 1934 bom 200 1934 36 bom lr 379 possession is a word that is incapable of an
Salary or wages
the seller place the buyer or such person as he directs in possession of the property pyare lal v emperor air 1945 all 135 1945 ilr all 207 sale is found to consist of a number of ingredients
Malice
in its legal sense it means a wrongful act done intentionally without just cause or excuse bhagat singh v emperor air 1930 lah 266 malice has been said to mean any wrong or indirect motive but a prosecution
Letters-patent, or letters overt
act of parliament and it should be construed in the same way as an act benoari lal sarma v emperor air 1943 cal 285
Fracture
the crack must extend from the outer surface of the skull to the inner surface in mutukdhar singh v emperor a 1942 pat 376 it was observed that if the evidence is merely that a none has been
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free